Culturing the Uncultured: Innovative Strategies to Overcome Marine Microorganism Cultivation Barriers

Abstract

Marine microorganisms represent a vast reservoir of untapped biological diversity with immense potential for drug discovery and biotechnology. However, the majority of these organisms have historically been inaccessible due to formidable cultivation challenges, often referred to as the 'great plate count anomaly.' This article provides a comprehensive overview for researchers and drug development professionals on the latest scientific advances to overcome these limitations. We explore the foundational reasons for microbial uncultivability, detail innovative methodological approaches from in situ cultivation to growth-curve-guided strategies, present troubleshooting and optimization frameworks for media and conditions, and validate findings through comparative and functional profiling. The integration of these advanced cultivation techniques with omics technologies is paving the way for discovering novel bioactive compounds and unlocking the full potential of marine microbial resources for biomedical applications.

Understanding the Uncultured Majority: Why Marine Microbes Resist Laboratory Cultivation

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

FAQ 1: What is the "Great Plate Count Anomaly" in marine microbiology? The "Great Plate Count Anomaly" describes the significant discrepancy, often several orders of magnitude, between the number of microbial cells observed in a marine sample via microscopy and the much smaller number that form colonies on standard agar media [1] [2]. In oceanic waters, traditional plating techniques typically culture only 0.01% to 0.1% of the total bacterial cells present, leaving the vast majority of microbial diversity uncharacterized and uncultured [1].

FAQ 2: Why are the majority of marine microorganisms considered "unculturable"? Marine microbes resist cultivation for several interconnected reasons:

• Non-standard Nutrient Conditions: Many indigenous marine bacteria are oligotrophic, meaning they are adapted to environments with very low nutrient concentrations. The high nutrient levels in standard laboratory media can inhibit their growth or even be toxic [1] [2].
• Unknown Growth Requirements: Specific, unidentified growth factors, vitamins, or signaling molecules present in their natural habitat may be absent in synthetic media [3] [2].
• Microbial Interdependence: In nature, bacteria often grow as consortia, relying on metabolic by-products from other species for essential nutrients. Standard isolation techniques disrupt these critical syntrophic interactions [2] [4].
• Dormancy States: A portion of the microbial community may exist in a dormant or slow-growing state, unable to rapidly proliferate under laboratory conditions [5].

FAQ 3: What are the key differences between "culturable" and "non-culturable" states? The distinction is not necessarily permanent but reflects whether the correct laboratory conditions have been discovered.

Table: Contrasting Culturable and Non-Culturable States

Feature	Culturable State	Non-Culturable State
Laboratory Growth	Grows on standard media	Requires specialized, often unknown, conditions
Nutrient Preference	Often copiotrophic (high nutrients)	Often oligotrophic (low nutrients)
Growth Rate	Typically faster	Can be extremely slow
Dependency	Often grows axenically	May require microbial neighbors (syntrophy)
Physiological State	Active	Can be active, dormant, or viable but non-culturable (VBNC)

FAQ 4: Has the estimated proportion of culturable marine microbes changed? Yes, with improved cultivation strategies, estimates have increased for some environments. While the 0.01-0.1% figure is classic, modern approaches like high-throughput extinction culturing have successfully cultured up to 14% of cells from coastal seawater samples, demonstrating that a significantly larger fraction is cultivable if the correct methods are used [1]. Recent studies analyzing diverse communities across biomes have found that a significant proportion of microorganisms have known culturable relatives, suggesting the gap may be narrower than traditionally thought, though still substantial [3].

Troubleshooting Guides

Problem 1: Failure to Isolate Dominant Microbial Taxa Revealed by Genetic Surveys

Symptoms: Genetic analysis (e.g., 16S rRNA sequencing) of your seawater sample shows a high abundance of Alphaproteobacteria (e.g., the SAR11 clade). However, your plating results on Marine Agar 2216 or R2A yield primarily Gammaproteobacteria [2].

Diagnosis: The standard, nutrient-rich media and high-oxygen plating conditions favor fast-growing, copiotrophic bacteria that are often minor community members in the open ocean, while suppressing the growth of the more abundant oligotrophic specialists [2].

Solution: Simulate the Natural Environment.

• Reduce Nutrient Concentration: Use oligotrophic media, such as diluted Marine R2A (e.g., 1/10 or 1/100 strength) or filtered, autoclaved, and buffered natural seawater [1] [2].
• Extend Incubation Time: Incubate plates for several weeks to months to accommodate slow-growing organisms [2].
• Modify Gelling Agent: Substitute agar with gellan gum. Agar can contain growth-inhibiting impurities, and gellan gum has been shown to increase viable counts and recovery of different bacterial taxa [4].

Table: Reagent Solutions for Oligotrophic Cultivation

Research Reagent	Function/Explanation
Filtered & Autoclaved Natural Seawater	Serves as a low-nutrient, chemically accurate base medium.
Gellan Gum	A purified gelling agent that can replace agar to reduce oxidative stress on sensitive marine isolates.
Catalase or Sodium Pyruvate	Scavenges hydrogen peroxide that can form in autoclaved media, reducing oxidative stress on cells [4].

Problem 2: Inability to Cultivate Microbes Dependent on Microbial Interactions

Symptoms: Microscopic counts confirm high cell density in a liquid enrichment, but you cannot obtain pure isolates on solid media. This suggests growth may depend on substances produced by other cells.

Diagnosis: The target microorganism has obligate or facultative syntrophic relationships with other microbes. Physical separation on a plate eliminates these essential cross-feeding interactions [2].

Solution: Facilitate Microbial Communication.

• Diffusion Chambers (e.g., iChip): Immerse a semi-permeable membrane containing diluted cells directly in the native environment, allowing chemical exchange with the surrounding seawater [4].
• Conditioned Media: Filter the spent medium from a mixed enrichment culture and use it to supplement fresh, low-nutrient media. This provides unknown growth factors produced by the community.
• Co-culture Experiments: Systematically culture the target organism with one or more helper strains that may provide essential nutrients or signaling molecules.

Problem 3: Low-Throughput and Insensitive Detection of Growth

Symptoms: When using low-nutrient media in small volumes (e.g., 96-well plates), culture growth is so slow and dilute that it is invisible to the naked eye, leading to false negatives.

Diagnosis: Standard visual inspection lacks the sensitivity to detect low-density microbial growth, especially in extinction culturing where initial inocula can be very small [1].

Solution: Implement High-Throughput, Sensitive Detection.

• Cell Arrays for Fluorescence Microscopy: This method involves filtering aliquots from multiple microtiter wells onto a single membrane, staining with DAPI, and examining under a fluorescence microscope. This allows for the efficient screening of thousands of cultures and detection of cell densities as low as 1.3 × 10³ cells/mL [1].
• Flow Cytometry: Use flow cytometry to automatically count and characterize cells in liquid cultures, providing a rapid and sensitive measure of growth, even in very dilute cultures [1].

The following workflow diagram illustrates the high-throughput culturing (HTC) method that integrates these solutions:

Experimental Protocol: High-Throughput Extinction Culturing

This protocol is adapted from Connon and Giovannoni (2002) and is designed to isolate previously uncultured oligotrophic marine bacteria [1].

Objective: To culture a diverse array of marine bacterioplankton by simulating in situ substrate concentrations and using high-throughput screening.

Materials:

• Media: Seawater collected from the target environment, filtered (0.2 µm), autoclaved, and sparged with COâ‚‚/air to restore bicarbonate buffer.
• Inoculum: Fresh marine water sample, processed within hours of collection.
• Equipment: 48-well non-tissue-culture-treated polystyrene plates; custom 48-array filter manifold; 0.2 µm white polycarbonate membrane; fluorescence microscope.

Method:

• Media Preparation: Filter and autoclave seawater. Sparge with sterile COâ‚‚ for 6 hours, then with sterile air for 12 hours. Check for sterility by DAPI staining and counting.
• Sample Inoculation:
  • Perform direct cell counts (via DAPI stain) on the inoculum to determine cell density.
  • Dilute the inoculum in the prepared seawater medium to a final concentration of approximately 1 to 5 cells per well.
  • Dispense 1 mL aliquots into the 48-well plates. Include control plates with uninoculated medium.
• Incubation: Incubate plates in the dark at in situ temperature (e.g., 16°C) for 3 weeks.
• Detection of Growth via Cell Array:
  • Filter 200 µL from each well into the corresponding chamber of the 48-array filter manifold.
  • DAPI-stain the cells directly on the membrane.
  • Transfer the membrane to a microscope slide and cover with a cover glass.
  • Systematically scan each sector of the array using a fluorescence microscope. Score a well as positive if cells are present.
  • (Optional) Estimate cell titer by counting cells in five random fields within positive sectors.
• Culture Recovery: Return to the original 48-well plate and recover the culture from positive wells for further purification and identification (e.g., by 16S rRNA gene sequencing).

Marine microorganisms are a vast reservoir of untapped biological potential, promising new bioactive compounds for drug development and sustainable food resources [6]. However, culturing these microbes in the laboratory presents significant challenges. In nature, marine microbes frequently exist in a state of slow growth or near-zero growth due to severe nutrient limitation and adverse conditions, a stark contrast to the optimal environments typically used in laboratory settings [7]. This discrepancy, compounded by issues of nutrient specificity and unidentified growth requirements, means that a vast majority of marine microbial diversity remains uncultured and unstudied. This technical support center provides targeted troubleshooting guides and FAQs to help researchers overcome these specific barriers, framed within the broader thesis of advancing marine microbiology research.

Troubleshooting Guides & FAQs

FAQ: Fundamental Challenges in Marine Microbial Culturing

• Why is it so difficult to culture marine microorganisms in the lab? The primary challenge is the mismatch between laboratory conditions and natural marine environments. Most culturing methods use nutrient-rich media, but in the ocean, microbes are adapted to survive under extreme nutrient limitation and complex biotic interactions that are difficult to replicate [7] [8].

• What is "near-zero growth" and why is it important? Near-zero growth is a state of maintenance metabolism where microbial cells are alive and metabolically active, but not dividing. In nature, this is the dominant state for many microbes due to limited nutrients. Understanding and replicating these conditions is key to cultivating a wider diversity of organisms [7].

• How do microbial interactions affect culturing success? Marine microbes exist in complex communities where they "talk to each other with a chemical language" [8]. Some bacteria provide essential nutrients like B-vitamins to their neighbors, while others produce algicidal compounds [9]. Isolating a microbe severs these critical interactions, which can halt growth.

Troubleshooting Common Experimental Issues

Problem: Consistent Failure in Isolating Target Microbes from Marine Samples.

• Potential Cause 1: Standard media are too nutrient-rich.
  • Solution: Employ nutrient dilution methods. Use oligotrophic media, such as diluted R2A seawater agar or a 1:10 dilution of a standard marine broth (e.g., Marine Broth 2216) with filter-sterilized seawater. This mimics the low-nutrient conditions many marine microbes are adapted to [7].
• Potential Cause 2: Missing essential chemical signals or cofactors from their natural community.
  • Solution: Implement co-culture or conditioned media techniques.
    • Co-culture: Introduce a "helper" strain, such as Mameliella alba, which has been shown to provide essential B-vitamins to other microbes [9].
    • Conditioned Media: Filter the supernatant from a growing microbial community from the same environment and add it (e.g., 10-50% v/v) to your sterile growth medium to introduce missing signaling molecules [9].
• Potential Cause 3: Unidentified growth requirements.
  • Solution: Utilize high-throughput screening with various nutrient amendments. Prepare a base minimal seawater medium and supplement different wells of a microtiter plate with various single carbon sources (e.g., pyruvate, acetate, chitin), nitrogen sources, or other potential nutrients to identify specific requirements.

Problem: Isolates Grow Exceptionally Slowly or Enter Stationary Phase Prematurely.

• Potential Cause: The laboratory environment fails to replicate the slow-growth state that is the organism's natural condition.
  • Solution: Use continuous culture systems like chemostats. Instead of batch culture, use a chemostat to maintain a constant, very slow growth rate under controlled nutrient limitation. This allows the study of microbial physiology and secondary metabolite production under conditions that more closely resemble their natural state [7].

Problem: Inability to Replicate Natural Product (e.g., Antimicrobial) Production in Lab Cultures.

• Potential Cause: Secondary metabolite production is often activated under stress or growth-limiting conditions, not during optimal, rapid growth.
  • Solution: Induce stress responses. Once a pure culture is obtained, experiment with stress factors such as:
    • Nutrient starvation (e.g., shifting to a nitrogen- or phosphorus-free medium).
    • Sub-inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics or other stressors.
    • Co-culture with a competing bacterial strain to simulate biotic stress [7] [9].

Summarized Data and Protocols

Table: Microbial Growth Phases and Metabolic States

Growth Phase / State	Key Characteristics	Relevance to Marine Culturing
Exponential Phase	Rapid cell division, high metabolic activity.	Typical target of lab cultures; rare in natural marine environments [7].
Stationary Phase	Growth cessation due to nutrient depletion/waste accumulation; activation of stress responses & secondary metabolite production [7].	A critical state to study for discovering novel bioactive compounds [7].
Near-Zero Growth	Maintenance metabolism, minimal to no cell division; cells remain viable and metabolically flexible [7].	The dominant state in oceans; key to unlocking "microbial dark matter" [7].

Table: Common Nutrient Amendments and Functions

Nutrient / Amendment	Function	Example Application
Sodium Pyruvate	Alternative carbon and energy source; can enhance recovery of stressed cells.	Added at 0.05-0.1% (w/v) to isolation media for samples from low-energy environments.
B-Vitamin Mix	Essential cofactors for many metabolic enzymes; often provided by symbionts in nature [9].	Add a filter-sterilized vitamin mix (e.g., Balch's vitamins) to minimal media at 1 mL/L.
Signal Molecules (e.g., AHLs)	Quorum sensing molecules that regulate group behaviors like bioluminescence and biofilm formation.	Use synthetic AHLs (e.g., N-(3-Oxooctanoyl)-L-homoserine lactone) at nanomolar concentrations to induce specific pathways.

Experimental Protocol: Simulating Nutrient-Limited Conditions for Isolation

Objective: To isolate marine microorganisms adapted to oligotrophic conditions by simulating their natural low-nutrient environment.

Materials:

• Filter-sterilized (0.22 µm) seawater, collected from the same site as the sample if possible.
• Gelling agent (e.g., Gellan Gum for a clear, low-nutrient gel).
• ï‚£ 50 mm Petri dishes.
• Marine sediment or water sample.

Methodology:

• Media Preparation: Prepare a 10x stock solution of a minimal salts medium (e.g., containing NHâ‚„Cl, Kâ‚‚HPOâ‚„). Dilute this stock 1:10 with filter-sterilized seawater to create a 1x working solution.
• Gelling: Add a low concentration of Gellan Gum (e.g., 0.5-0.8% w/v) to the diluted medium. Heat to dissolve completely.
• Pouring Plates: Autoclave the medium and allow it to cool to approximately 45°C before pouring into sterile Petri dishes.
• Inoculation: Spread-plate a low concentration of the marine sample (e.g., 50-100 µL of a diluted sample) onto the solidified medium.
• Incubation: Seal plates in plastic bags to prevent desiccation and incubate at the in situ temperature (or a relevant range) for 4 to 12 weeks, monitoring periodically for the appearance of very slow-growing microcolonies [7].

Research Reagent Solutions

Table: Essential Materials for Overcoming Marine Culturing Barriers

Item	Function	Specific Example
Oligotrophic Media	Provides a low-nutrient base that prevents the overgrowth of fast-growing species and supports slow-growing specialists.	Dilute Marine Broth, R2A Seawater Agar, Synthetic Seawater Medium with trace carbon.
Chemical Supplementations	Provides specific nutrients or signals that are missing in artificial media but required for growth.	B-Vitamin Mix, Sodium Pyruvate, Quorum Sensing Molecules (AHLs), Siderophores.
Continuous Culture Systems (Chemostats)	Maintains microbial populations in a steady state of slow growth under precise nutrient limitation, mimicking natural conditions [7].	Bench-top bioreactor systems with controlled nutrient feed and effluent removal.
DNA/RNA Extraction Kits (Marine)	For molecular validation of culture identity and analysis of community DNA/RNA from initial samples to guide culturing efforts.	Metagenomic DNA extraction kits optimized for low-biomass, high-inhibitor marine samples.
Gellan Gum	A superior gelling agent for forming a clear, solid surface with less potential for inhibition than agar, ideal for visualizing microcolonies.	Gelrite, Phytagel.

Signaling Pathways and Experimental Workflows

Diagram: Microbial Interaction Network Influencing Growth

Diagram: Workflow for Isolating Slow-Growth Marine Microbes

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: What are the most common reasons for culture failure when working with microorganisms from extreme environments? Culture failure is frequently due to an environmental mismatch between the natural habitat and the laboratory culture conditions. Common specific reasons include: inaccurate replication of physicochemical conditions (temperature, pH, hydrostatic pressure), the presence of toxic oxygen levels for anaerobic taxa, inadequate supply of specific electron donors/acceptors, and missing essential trace elements or growth factors found in the native environment [10].

Q2: Which physicochemical parameters are most critical to replicate for deep-sea hydrothermal vent microorganisms? The most critical parameters to control are temperature, pH, and specific electron donors and acceptors [10]. The required values vary significantly between taxa, as shown in Table 1. For example, many chemosynthetic organisms rely on hydrogen or sulfur compounds as energy sources [11].

Q3: How can I prevent oxidative stress in anaerobic isolates from anoxic environments like hydrothermal vents or sediments? Maintain a strict anoxic environment throughout the cultivation process. This involves using an anaerobic chamber or sealed tubes with an anoxic gas headspace (e.g., Nâ‚‚/COâ‚‚ or Hâ‚‚/COâ‚‚ mixes). The culture medium should be pre-reduced with supplements like sodium sulfide (Naâ‚‚S) or cysteine-HCl [10].

Q4: What is the significance of large genome sizes discovered in some marine bacteria, and how might it affect their culturing? The discovery of bacterial genomes up to 18.4 Mb in size, redefining the upper limit for marine bacteria, suggests a high degree of metabolic versatility and regulatory complexity [12]. These organisms may have evolved under conditions of high environmental variability. To culture them, it may be necessary to provide a complex mixture of nutrients or simulate fluctuating conditions that mimic their native ecosystem [12].

Q5: Can you provide an example of a successful cultivation methodology for a nitrous oxide (Nâ‚‚O)-reducing bacterium from a deep-sea vent? A novel thermophilic bacterium from the Okinawa Trough was successfully cultured. It can use the greenhouse gas Nâ‚‚O as a terminal electron acceptor, reducing it to harmless Nâ‚‚ gas. It can also utilize COâ‚‚ as a carbon source. Culture experiments were conducted under elevated temperature and specific gas mixtures (Nâ‚‚O, COâ‚‚) to demonstrate this high reduction ability [11].

Troubleshooting Guides

Issue 1: No Growth in Inoculated Cultures

Possible Cause	Recommended Action	Preventive Measures
Incorrect Temperature	Verify the optimal temperature for your target organism (see Table 1).	Research the isolation source's known temperature range before setting up cultures [10].
Inadequate Energy Source	Provide a mix of potential electron donors (H₂, S⁰, S₂O₃²⁻) and acceptors (O₂, NO₃⁻, S⁰, SO₄²⁻).	Design media based on meta-omics data from the source environment [10].
Oxidative Stress	Ensure anoxic conditions for anaerobes by using resazurin as a redox indicator.	Pre-reduce media and use anaerobic work chambers for strict anaerobes [10].
Missing Growth Factors	Supplement media with yeast extract, vitamins, or trace element mixtures.	Co-culture with other microbes from the same environment or use habitat-simulated medium [10].

Issue 2: Growth Inhibition After Initial Success

Possible Cause	Recommended Action	Preventive Measures
Toxin Accumulation	Sub-culture into fresh medium or use a continuous culture system.	Use a larger medium-to-inoculum volume ratio to dilute waste products.
Nutrient Depletion	Replenish energy sources and carbon donors during extended cultivation.	Monitor metabolic substrates and products (e.g., Hâ‚‚S, CHâ‚„) in real-time if possible [10].
pH Shift	Monitor pH during growth and use buffered media with HEPES or PIPES.	Adjust the buffer capacity and type to match the natural habitat's stability [13].
Precipitation	Check for precipitation of metal sulfides or other ions; adjust medium composition.	Ensure thorough mixing and proper dissolution of all medium components [13].

Data Tables

Genus (Phylum)	Optimal Temperature (°C)	Metabolism & Electron Usage	Isolation Source
Desulfurobacterium (Aquificae)	65 - 75	Anaerobe, autotroph, H₂-oxidizer, S⁰-reducer	Chimney, sulfide, animal
Persephonella (Aquificae)	73	Aerobe/anaerobe, autotroph, S-oxidizer	Chimney
Caminibacter (Campylobacterota)	55 - 60	Aerobe/anaerobe, autotroph, H₂-oxidizer, S⁰-reducer	Chimney
Nautilia (Campylobacterota)	40 - 60	Anaerobe, autotroph/heterotroph, H₂-oxidizer, S⁰-reducer	Chimney, animal
Sulfurovum (Campylobacterota)	28 - 35	Aerobe/anaerobe, autotroph, S-oxidizer, Hâ‚‚-oxidizer	Chimney, sediment, rock, animal
Deferribacter (Deferribacteres)	60 - 65	Anaerobe, heterotroph, Hâ‚‚-oxidizer, Fe-reducer	Chimney, fluid
Marinithermus (Deinococcus-Thermus)	67.5	Aerobe, heterotroph	Chimney

Pathway	Description	Typical Microbial Groups
Calvin-Benson-Bassham (CBB) Cycle	The most common COâ‚‚ fixation pathway; uses RuBisCO enzyme.	Zetaproteobacteria, Thiomicrospira, Beggiatoa, animal endosymbionts.
Reductive Tricarboxylic Acid (rTCA) Cycle	Preferred by many anaerobes and aerobic Campylobacterota.	Desulfobacterales, Aquificales, Thermoproteales, Campylobacterota.
3-Hydroxypropionate/4-Hydroxybutyrate (3-HP/4-HB) Cycle	Used by many mixotrophs.	Desulfobacterium autotrophicum, acetogens, methanogenic archaea.
Reductive Acetyl-CoA Pathway	-	Acetogenic bacteria, methanogenic archaea.
Dicarboxylate/4-Hydroxybutyrate Cycle	-	Deferribacter autotrophicus (can also use the roTCA cycle).

Experimental Protocols

Protocol: Designing a Selective Cultivation Medium for Deep-Sea Chemolithoautotrophs

Principle: This protocol outlines the steps to create a medium that supports the growth of chemosynthetic microorganisms by replicating the key chemical energy sources of their habitat [10].

Materials:

• Artificial seawater base
• Vitamin and trace element solutions
• Electron donors (e.g., Naâ‚‚S·9Hâ‚‚O, Naâ‚‚Sâ‚‚O₃, Hâ‚‚ gas)
• Electron acceptors (e.g., Oâ‚‚, NO₃⁻, S⁰, SO₄²⁻)
• pH buffer (e.g., HEPES, PIPES)
• Resazurin (redox indicator)
• Anaerobic chamber or gas exchange system

Procedure:

• Base Medium Preparation: Prepare an artificial seawater solution, omitting oxygen-sensitive components.
• Add Buffers and Nutrients: Add a pH buffer suitable for the target pH (e.g., neutral for many Campylobacterota, slightly acidic for some thermophiles). Add vitamin and trace element mixes.
• Add Electron Donors/Acceptors: Based on the target physiology (see Table 1 & 2):
  • For sulfur-oxidizers: Add Naâ‚‚Sâ‚‚O₃ and a limited amount of Oâ‚‚.
  • For hydrogen-oxidizers: Equilibrate the medium with Hâ‚‚/COâ‚‚ gas mix.
  • For sulfate-reducers: Add Naâ‚‚S as a reducing agent and SO₄²⁻ as an electron acceptor.
• Set Redox Potential: Add resazurin. For anaerobes, pre-reduce the medium by boiling and sparging with Nâ‚‚, then add a reducing agent like Naâ‚‚S until the resazurin becomes colorless.
• Dispense and Inoculate: Dispense the medium into tubes or bottles. For anaerobes, do this within an anaerobic chamber or with continuous sparging of anoxic gas. Inoculate with sample material.
• Incubate: Incubate at the appropriate temperature and pressure, if applicable. Monitor for growth visually (turbidity), microscopically, or via chemical consumption/production (e.g., Hâ‚‚S production).

Diagrams and Workflows

Cultivation Workflow for Extreme Marine Microbes

Key Microbial Carbon Fixation Pathways

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Reagent / Material	Function in Cultivation
Artificial Seawater Base	Provides the fundamental ionic composition (Na⁺, Mg²⁺, Cl⁻, SO₄²⁻) of the marine environment.
HEPES/PIPES Buffers	Maintains a stable pH in the medium, critical for replicating specific microniches (e.g., neutral vs. acidic vents).
Sodium Sulfide (Na₂S·9H₂O)	Acts as a reducing agent to maintain anoxic conditions and as an electron donor for sulfur-oxidizing bacteria.
Sodium Thiosulfate (Na₂S₂O₃)	A common, soluble electron donor for cultivating sulfur-oxidizing microorganisms.
Hydrogen Gas (Hâ‚‚/COâ‚‚ Mix)	Serves as an electron donor for hydrogen-oxidizing chemolithoautotrophs and a carbon source with COâ‚‚.
Nitrate (NO₃⁻) / Nitrous Oxide (N₂O)	Acts as an alternative electron acceptor for denitrification and, for N₂O, studies on greenhouse gas reduction [11].
Vitamin & Trace Element Mixes	Supplies essential cofactors and micronutrients required for microbial growth that may be absent in a defined basal medium.
Resazurin	A redox indicator that turns pink in the presence of oxygen, visually confirming the anoxic status of the medium.
Gellan Gum	A substitute for agar to solidify media, as it is more stable at high temperatures and does not inhibit growth of some fastidious organisms.
VDR agonist 3	VDR agonist 3, MF:C24H36O7, MW:436.5 g/mol
tBID	tBID, MF:C11H3Br4N3O2, MW:528.78 g/mol

FAQs: Overcoming Challenges in Marine Microorganism Research

FAQ 1: Why should I use co-culture instead of genetic engineering to activate silent biosynthetic pathways? Genetic engineering often faces challenges with plasmid instability and a substantial metabolic burden on engineered strains, which can lead to the loss of desired traits during growth [14]. Co-culture mimics natural ecosystems, where microbial interactions provide a balanced distribution of energy resources for cell growth and the coordinated expression of metabolic pathways necessary for metabolite synthesis [14]. This approach leverages ecological interactions to activate silent biosynthetic gene clusters without the need for complex genetic manipulation [15].

FAQ 2: My co-culture does not produce the expected new metabolites. What could be wrong? The outcome of a co-culture system is highly specific to the paired microorganisms and the environmental conditions [16]. The results may not always be novel compounds and can instead manifest as one of three outcomes:

• A significant increase in the yield of known bioactive compounds [16].
• The production of known compounds that were not detected in axenic monocultures [16].
• The production of previously undescribed compounds [16]. Success depends on factors like nutrient availability, the presence of signaling molecules, and the dynamics of intercellular communication [14].

FAQ 3: How can I improve the stability and reproducibility of my microbial consortia? Community stability is a recognized challenge in co-culture technology. To improve stability:

• Optimize environmental factors such as medium composition, pH, and nutrient availability, as these heavily shape interactions and metabolic activities [14].
• Aim for a balanced growth of both partners, as some systems require this for reproducible metabolite production [16].
• Explore the use of synthetic communities with well-defined genetic backgrounds to reduce unpredictability [17].

FAQ 4: What is the "phycosphere" and why is it important for microbial interactions? The phycosphere is a microscale mucosal region around a phytoplankton cell, analogous to the rhizosphere of terrestrial plants [17]. It is a critical environment where metabolic interactions between the phytoplankton and associated bacteria and archaea navigate the biochemistry of the sea [17]. Studying these micro-environments is essential for understanding how metabolic interactions drive large-scale biochemical processes [17].

Troubleshooting Guides

Problem: Low or Undetectable Yield of Target Metabolites

Possible Cause	Diagnostic Steps	Recommended Solution
Silent Biosynthetic Gene Clusters	Perform genomic analysis (e.g., antiSMASH) to identify cryptic gene clusters not expressed in lab conditions [16].	Employ co-culture with a challenging partner. Example: Co-culture of *Streptomyces cinnabarinus with Alteromonas sp. induced a 10.4-fold increase in the antifouling diterpene lobocompactol [16].
Sub-optimal Culture Conditions	Analyze the impact of different media (solid vs. liquid), salinity, and carbon sources on metabolomic profiles.	Implement the OSMAC (One Strain Many Compounds) approach. Systematically vary culture parameters like medium composition and agitation to activate different pathways [15].
Lack of Essential Ecological Signals	Check if the co-culture requires physical contact or close proximity for metabolite induction.	Optimize the cultivation method. Example: Static incubation was critical for the balanced growth of *Streptomyces sp. and Bacillus mycoides, leading to significant production of bacillamides and tryptamine derivatives [16].

Problem: Unstable Co-culture with One Strain Dominating

Possible Cause	Diagnostic Steps	Recommended Solution
Competitive Exclusion	Monitor individual population dynamics in the co-culture using colony-forming unit (CFU) counts or qPCR.	Engineer syntrophy by designing the system so that the waste product of one strain is the nutrient source for the other, creating mutual dependence [14].
Inhibitory Metabolite Production	Identify the inhibitory compound through metabolomic analysis of the culture supernatant.	Introduce a resistant partner. Example: Using a lobocompactol-resistant strain of *Alteromonas sp. allowed for stable co-culture and high production of the compound [16].
Nutrient Imbalance	Analyze the medium composition to ensure it does not preferentially support one strain.	Use a minimal or defined medium that forces interdependence, or use fed-batch techniques to control nutrient availability [14].

Quantitative Data on Co-culture Outcomes

The table below summarizes documented results from marine bacterial co-cultures, demonstrating the potential of this approach to enhance metabolite production.

Table 1: Enhanced Metabolite Production in Marine Bacterial Co-cultures

Co-culture System	Metabolite(s) Produced	Outcome vs. Monoculture	Reference Activity/Note
Streptomyces cinnabarinus PK209 + Alteromonas sp. KNS-16	Lobocompactol (antifouling diterpene)	10.4-fold increase in production	[16]
Streptomyces sp. CGMCC4.7185 + Bacillus mycoides	Bacillamides A-C, Tryptamine derivatives	Significant increase; compounds barely detected in axenic culture	[16]
Streptomyces sp. PTY087I2 + MRSA	Granatomycin D, Granaticin, Dihydrogranaticin B	Significantly increased antibacterial activity and compound detection	MIC against MRSA: 6.25 μg/ml [16]
Streptomyces sp. ANAM-5 + Streptomyces sp. AIAH-10	Crude extract with anticancer activity	75.75% inhibition of EAC cells at 100 mg/kg dose	Increased mouse lifespan by 71.79% [16]

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Co-culture for Antibacterial Compound Induction

This protocol is adapted from a study where co-culture of Streptomyces sp. PTY087I2 with pathogen bacteria induced enhanced production of naphthoquinone derivatives with antibacterial activity [16].

1. Materials and Reagents

• Strains: Target marine bacterium (e.g., Streptomyces sp.), inducing pathogen (e.g., Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA)).
• Growth Medium: Liquid medium per liter: Peptone (1 g), Yeast Extract (2 g), Starch (5 g), Instant Ocean (33 g) [16].
• Equipment: Shaker incubator, Centrifuge, Laminar flow hood, Erlenmeyer flasks.

2. Procedure

• Step 1: Pre-culture. Inoculate the marine bacterium and the inducing pathogen separately into the growth medium. Incubate at 30°C with shaking for 24-48 hours to establish active cultures [16].
• Step 2: Inoculation. In a fresh flask containing the growth medium, inoculate with the pre-cultured marine bacterium. The inducing pathogen can be added simultaneously or after a delay, depending on the experimental design.
• Step 3: Co-culture Fermentation. Incubate the co-culture at 30°C for 10 days with agitation (e.g., 220 rpm) [16].
• Step 4: Harvest and Extraction. After incubation, separate the biomass from the culture broth by centrifugation. The cell-free supernatant can be extracted with an organic solvent like ethyl acetate. The biomass can be extracted with a solvent like methanol.
• Step 5: Analysis. Analyze the crude extracts for antibacterial activity using assays like Minimum Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) and for chemical composition using Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) [16].

Protocol 2: Static Co-culture for Metabolite Optimization

This protocol is effective for co-culture systems that require balanced, static growth for optimal metabolite production, as demonstrated with Streptomyces sp. and Bacillus mycoides [16].

1. Materials and Reagents

• Strains: The two marine bacteria to be co-cultured.
• Optimized Medium: Per liter: Glycerol (5 g), Yeast Extract (5 g), 75% seawater, pH 8.0 [16].
• Equipment: Static incubator.

2. Procedure

• Step 1: Pre-culture the Producer. Inoculate the primary metabolite producer (e.g., Streptomyces sp.) into the optimized medium and incubate with shaking for 7 days [16].
• Step 2: Introduce the Partner. After 7 days, add a 1% (v/v) inoculum of the challenging partner (e.g., B. mycoides) to the established culture [16].
• Step 3: Static Co-culture. Transfer the co-culture to static incubation conditions (without shaking) and incubate for an additional 14 days [16].
• Step 4: Monitoring and Harvest. Monitor the system for balanced growth. Harvest and extract as described in Protocol 1.

Signaling Pathways and Metabolic Interactions in Co-culture

The following diagram illustrates the key mechanisms and signaling interactions that are activated in a successful microbial co-culture system.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Research Reagents

Table 2: Key Reagents for Marine Microbe Co-culture Experiments

Reagent Category	Specific Item Example	Function in Co-culture Research
Culture Media Components	Instant Ocean / Artificial Sea Salts	Replicates the natural marine ionic environment, crucial for osmoregulation and function of marine isolates [16].
	Glycerol & Yeast Extract	Common carbon and nitrogen sources in optimized media for marine actinomycetes; their concentration can be tuned to force interdependence [16].
Elicitor Strains	Mycolic-acid-containing Bacteria	Used to challenge actinomycetes, often leading to activation of silent biosynthetic gene clusters and production of new antibiotics [16].
	Resistant Pathogen Strains (e.g., MRSA)	Co-culture with resistant targets can induce the producer strain to synthesize defensive antimicrobial compounds [16].
Analytical Tools	LC-MS/MS (Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry)	Essential for detecting, identifying, and quantifying known and novel metabolites in complex co-culture extracts [16].
	AntiSMASH (Software)	A genomic tool used to identify Biosynthetic Gene Clusters (BGCs) in a strain's genome, guiding the choice of co-culture candidates [16].
8-CPT-6-Phe-cAMP	8-CPT-6-Phe-cAMP, MF:C22H19ClN5O6PS, MW:547.9 g/mol	Chemical Reagent
Sp-8-pCPT-PET-cGMPS	Sp-8-pCPT-PET-cGMPS, MF:C24H19ClN5O6PS2, MW:604.0 g/mol	Chemical Reagent

Advanced Cultivation Techniques: From In Situ Chambers to Microfluidic Devices

The Core Challenge: Why Marine Microorganisms Resist Cultivation

A fundamental obstacle in marine microbiology is the "great plate count anomaly"—the observation that typically only 1% of marine bacteria seen under a microscope can be cultured using standard laboratory procedures [18]. The majority of marine microorganisms have evolved to thrive in specific, often extreme, environments characterized by unique combinations of temperature, light, pressure, nutrient availability, and biological interactions [19] [20] [21]. When removed from these intricate environmental networks and placed on conventional, nutrient-rich agar plates, many microbes enter a dormant state or simply fail to grow, limiting our access to their bioactive potential [21].

Strategic Framework: Matching Cultivation Strategies to Microbial Physiology

To systematically address uncultivability, researchers categorize target microorganisms based on their abundance and physiological state, with each group requiring a distinct isolation strategy [21].

Technical Solution 1: Advanced Gelling Agents as Solid Substrates

The choice of gelling agent is a critical, yet often overlooked, factor that significantly impacts the culturability of marine microbes. Moving beyond traditional agar can dramatically improve recovery rates.

Comparison of Common Gelling Agents

Gelling Agent	Source	Melting Temp.	Key Characteristics	Best For
Agar [22] [23]	Red Seaweed (Gelidium, Gracillaria)	~85°C	Standard; good clarity; metabolically inert for many microbes	General purpose; mesophilic cultures
Gellan Gum [18] [22]	Bacterium (Sphingomonas elodea)	~110°C	High clarity; forms gel with cations (Mg²⁺, Ca²⁺); stable at low concentrations	Improving overall diversity; previously uncultured groups
Gelatin [22]	Animal Collagen	~37°C	Digested by many bacteria; low melting point	Historical use; not recommended for most microbial work
Carrageenan [22]	Red Seaweed	50-80°C	Stable at high pH	Cultivating alkaliphilic microorganisms
Xanthan Gum [22]	Bacterium (Xanthomonas campestris)	~270°C	Stable over wide pH/temperature range; high viscosity	Growing various bacteria and fungi

Key Experimental Findings

• Superiority of Gellan Gum: Replacing agar with gellan gum in media formulations increased viable counts by 3 to 40-fold, achieving culturability of up to 6.6% of total bacterial counts compared to a maximum of 2.3% on agar-based substrates [18].
• Enhanced Diversity: The culturable bacterial communities grown on gellan gum were significantly different and more representative of the original seawater community than those grown on agar, enabling the growth of bacterial orders that did not form colonies on agar [18].

Technical Solution 2: Mimicking the Natural Environment

Abiotic Factor Control

Creating an incubation environment that closely mirrors the dynamic conditions of the target marine habitat is crucial for success.

• Dynamic Temperature and Light Control: A modified shaking water bath system can be programmed with fully customizable temperature and light gradients, or can scrape and mimic real-time field data from coastal buoys. This allows for the simulation of natural diurnal cycles, which are critical for maintaining authentic microbial community structure and function [19].
• Chemical Composition: Using filtered, autoclaved natural seawater as the base for media, rather than artificial seawater, helps to preserve essential trace elements and micronutrients. For oligotrophic (nutrient-poor) microbes, creating low-nutrient media such as SWG (Seawater Gellan gum) is essential to avoid overfeeding and metabolic shock [18].

Incorporating Biotic and Signaling Factors

• Quorum Sensing Molecules: Supplementing media with acylated homoserine lactones (AHLs), which are bacterial signaling molecules, has been shown to increase the relative abundance of certain bacterial groups like Sphingobacteria, though the effect on total viable counts can be variable [18].
• Co-culture and Diffusion Systems: Devices like the iChip (isolation chip) allow for the cultivation of microbes in situ or in the lab while permitting the diffusion of chemical growth factors and signaling molecules from neighboring microbes, simulating the natural web of biological interactions [24].

Troubleshooting Guide: FAQs on Media and Gelling Agents

Q1: My gellan gum media is forming clumps during preparation. How can I prevent this? A: Clumping occurs when the outer molecules of the gelling agent hydrate too quickly, forming a barrier that prevents the medium from penetrating. To avoid this:

• Use a magnetic stirrer to ensure rapid and thorough mixing while adding the gelling agent to the hot liquid [25].
• Consider adding a small amount of glycerol as a wetting agent to reduce clump formation [25] [23].
• Sieve the powder into the medium while stirring gently [23].

Q2: My solid culture media appears watery and has a glassy appearance. What is happening? A: This is a sign of vitrification (or hyperhydricity), which is caused by excessive hydration of the medium [25].

• Solution: Increase the concentration of your gelling agent to reduce the water retention capacity of the media [25].

Q3: How long should I wait for marine isolates to grow? A: Patience is key. Many marine oligotrophs are slow-growing. Incubation times can vary significantly:

• Standard incubation at 25°C may require at least 2 to 5 weeks for colony formation [18].
• Incubation at lower temperatures (e.g., 10°C) for samples from cold environments may require extended incubation of 5 to 10 weeks or more [18].

Experimental Protocol: Culturing with Gellan Gum

This protocol is adapted from methods shown to significantly improve the culturability of marine bacteria [18].

Objective: To prepare solid culture media using gellan gum as a gelling agent for the isolation of marine bacteria.

Materials:

• Gellan gum (e.g., Gelrite, Phytagel)
• Marine Broth (MB) or filtered natural seawater (SW)
• Divalent cation solution (e.g., MgClâ‚‚ or CaClâ‚‚, filter-sterilized)
• Standard microbiology lab equipment (autoclave, stir plate, etc.)

Procedure:

• Prepare Liquid Base: Prepare the liquid medium (e.g., Marine Broth or filtered seawater) according to your requirements. Gellan gum requires cations to gel.
• Add Gelling Agent: Add gellan gum to the cold liquid medium at a concentration of 2.0 g/L [25]. To prevent clumping, stir vigorously and continuously while sprinkling in the powder.
• Autoclave: Autoclave the medium at 121°C for 20 minutes [25]. The gellan gum will be in solution and the medium will appear clear.
• Add Cations: After autoclaving and cooling to approximately 40-50°C, aseptically add a filter-sterilized solution of MgClâ‚‚ or CaClâ‚‚ to a final concentration of approximately 5-10 mM. Mix gently but thoroughly. Note: Without these cations, the gellan gum will not form a firm gel.
• Pour Plates: Quickly pour the medium into sterile Petri dishes (approx. 20 mL per plate) before it solidifies.
• Inoculate and Incubate: Inoculate with your marine sample and incubate under appropriate conditions (temperature, light) for several weeks, monitoring periodically for colony formation.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Reagents and Materials

Item	Function/Application	Example/Notes
Gellan Gum [18] [25] [22]	Alternative gelling agent for improved culturability of diverse marine bacteria.	Products: Gelrite, Phytagel. Requires divalent cations (Mg²⁺, Ca²⁺) to solidify.
iChip (Isolation Chip) [24]	High-throughput in situ cultivation device that facilitates growth via diffusion of natural metabolites and signals.	Useful for isolating rare active bacteria and those dependent on helper microbes.
Acylated Homoserine Lactones (AHLs) [18]	Quorum-sensing signaling molecules used to induce growth in bacteria that require community signals.	Supplemented at low concentrations (e.g., 0.5 μM) in media.
Catalase or Sodium Pyruvate [24]	Scavenging agents added to media to reduce hydrogen peroxide and other reactive oxygen species.	Mitigates oxidative stress, improving colony formation for some sensitive strains.
Circulating Chiller & Heating Pads [19]	Components of a custom incubation system for creating dynamic, environmentally-relevant temperature cycles.	Essential for experiments where temperature fluctuation is a key environmental parameter.
CK1-IN-2	CK1-IN-2, MF:C17H12FN3O2, MW:309.29 g/mol	Chemical Reagent
(11Z)-eicosenoyl-CoA	(11Z)-eicosenoyl-CoA, MF:C41H72N7O17P3S, MW:1060.0 g/mol	Chemical Reagent

Troubleshooting Common Experimental Issues

FAQ 1: My dilution-to-extinction cultures are showing no growth. What could be the cause?

Several factors can lead to unsuccessful cultures. The table below summarizes common issues and solutions.

Problem	Potential Cause	Recommended Solution
No growth in wells	Medium toxicity (overly rich) or incorrect osmotic conditions [26] [21]	Use filtered seawater from the sample site as the base for the dilution medium or prepare an artificial seawater medium [26].
	Substrate concentration is too high, proving toxic for oligotrophs [26] [21]	Dilute standard laboratory media (e.g., 10% Tryptic Soy Broth) or use low-nutrient media specifically designed for marine oligotrophs [27].
Contamination in multiple wells	Failure of aseptic technique during sample preparation or plating [26]	Strictly practice aseptic techniques, including equipment sterilization and the use of a controlled environment like a laminar flow hood [26].
Overgrowth from fast-growing strains	Inefficient separation of cells; dilution factor not optimal [28]	Perform a dilution series to achieve a theoretical concentration of 1–10 cells per well and select plates where only 30%–50% of wells show growth for isolation [26] [27].

FAQ 2: I am trying to isolate rare microbes using microfluidics, but my recovery rates for sorted cells are low. How can I improve this?

Low recovery rates after sorting are often related to cell stress or damage during the process.

• Use Protective Encapsulation: Techniques like double water-in-oil-in-water (W/O/W) emulsions or encapsulation in gel microdroplets (agarose) can protect cells from shear stress during sorting and maintain a more favorable micro-environment. These are compatible with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) [29].
• Optimize Droplet Size and Sorting Parameters: Ensure that the microdroplets are large enough to not physically damage the cells but small enough for high-throughput processing. Validate and adjust the sorting parameters (e.g., pressure, trigger threshold) on control samples to maximize viability [29].
• Employ In Situ Cultivation: For particularly fragile or fastidious cells, consider using microfluidic devices like the microbe domestication pod (MD Pod) that allow for incubation of encapsulated cells in their natural environment, bypassing the need for immediate laboratory cultivation and sorting altogether [29].

FAQ 3: My microfluidic device is prone to clogging when processing environmental marine samples. What can I do?

Clogging is a common issue with complex environmental samples.

• Implement Pre-filtration: Pre-process the sample by passing it through a filter with a larger pore size (e.g., 5-10 μm) to remove large particulate matter and debris before loading it into the microfluidic chip [30].
• Design Clog-Resistant Architectures: If designing a custom device, incorporate features that minimize trap points, such as avoiding sudden changes in channel diameter and using weir-style filters instead of pillar arrays where possible.

Experimental Protocols for Key Techniques

Protocol 1: Dilution-to-Extinction Culturing for Marine Samples

This protocol is adapted for isolating marine microorganisms and is based on established methods used for plant and marine microbiota [26] [28] [27].

Key Research Reagent Solutions:

Reagent/Material	Function in the Protocol
Filtered Seawater	Serves as the base for dilution media, mimicking the natural ionic and osmotic conditions of the sample environment [26].
10% Tryptic Soy Broth (TSB)	A low-nutrient growth medium suitable for oligotrophic marine bacteria. Prepared in filtered seawater [27].
Sterile 1X Phosphate-Buffered Saline (PBS)	Used for sample washing and preparing initial cell suspensions [28].
96-well Microplates	The platform for high-throughput dilution culturing [28] [27].

Detailed Methodology:

• Sample Preparation and Cell Suspension:

  • For water samples, concentrate microbial biomass via filtration (e.g., onto a 0.22 μm filter) and resuspend in a small volume of sterile PBS or filtered seawater [30].
  • For sediment samples, homogenize a small amount (e.g., 1 g) in sterile PBS or filtered seawater and allow large particles to settle. Use the supernatant as the cell suspension [26].

• Serial Dilution:

  • Perform a serial dilution of the cell suspension in your chosen growth medium (e.g., 10% TSB in filtered seawater). A threefold serial dilution series is common, starting from a 2000× dilution to over 480,000× [27].
  • The goal is to statistically dilute the sample to a point where aliquots contain, on average, fewer than one cell.

• Inoculation and Incubation:

  • Dispense the diluted suspensions into sterile 96-well microtiter plates, typically 100-200 μL per well.
  • Seal the plates to prevent evaporation and incubate them at a temperature relevant to the sample's origin (e.g., room temperature for surface water) for an extended period (e.g., 12 days to several weeks). Patience is critical, as many marine microbes are slow-growing [26] [21].

• Identification of Positive Growth and Isolation:

  • Screen the plates for turbidity, which indicates microbial growth.
  • For downstream isolation and identification, select plates where only 18-55% of wells show growth. This increases the probability that the growth originated from a single cell [27].
  • Use an aliquot from positive wells for streak plating on solid media to obtain pure cultures or proceed directly to molecular identification (e.g., 16S rRNA gene sequencing) [27].

Protocol 2: Microfluidic Isolation via Gel Microdroplet Encapsulation

This protocol outlines a high-throughput method for isolating single microbial cells using microfluidics [26] [29].

Key Research Reagent Solutions:

Reagent/Material	Function in the Protocol
Agarose	Forms a porous gel matrix for the microdroplets, allowing diffusion of nutrients and waste while physically separating individual cells [26].
Fluorinated Oil with Surfactant	Forms the oil phase for generating water-in-oil emulsions, stabilizing the droplets and preventing coalescence.
Lysis Buffer & PCR Master Mix	Used for downstream genetic analysis directly from the microdroplets or sorted cells.

Detailed Methodology:

• Sample Preparation: Prepare a concentrated cell suspension as described in the dilution-to-extinction protocol.

• Microdroplet Generation:

  • Mix the cell suspension with molten, low-melting-point agarose.
  • Using a microfluidic droplet generator, disperse this mixture into a flowing stream of fluorinated oil to form a water-in-oil emulsion. The conditions are controlled to generate droplets where a small fraction contain a single bacterial cell [26] [29].
  • Rapidly cool the emulsion to solidify the agarose, forming gel microdroplets (GMDs).

• Incubation and Screening:

  • Incubate the GMDs in a nutrient medium that diffuses into the droplets.
  • Cells that grow will form microcolonies within their respective droplets.
  • Screen for droplets containing microcolonies, potentially using fluorescent dyes or biosensors that indicate metabolic activity or the production of a compound of interest [29].

• Sorting and Recovery:

  • Use Fluorescence-Activated Cell Sorting (FACS) to selectively sort GMDs based on the screening signal (e.g., fluorescence from a biosensor) [29].
  • The sorted GMDs can be broken or dissolved to release the microcolonies for further cultivation on standard agar plates or for direct molecular analysis.

Workflow and Process Diagrams

Diagram 1: Dilution-to-Extinction Culturing Workflow

Diagram 2: Microfluidic Gel Microdroplet Isolation Workflow

Overcoming the limitation of the "uncultured majority" is a central challenge in marine microbiology research. While metagenomics has revealed an immense diversity of marine microbes, translating this genetic blueprint into successful cultivation requires precise, data-driven strategies. This technical support center provides targeted troubleshooting and methodologies to help researchers design effective culture media based on metagenomic insights, thereby bridging the gap between sequence data and living microbial isolates.

Troubleshooting Guides

FAQ 1: My metagenome-assembled genome (MAG) suggests my target bacterium should grow on my designed media, but I see no growth after 2 weeks. What should I do?

Answer: This common issue often stems from incomplete metabolic pathway interpretation or unmet growth requirements. We recommend the following systematic approach:

• Re-examine MAG Completeness and Contamination: First, verify the quality of your MAG. A genome with low completeness may be missing essential metabolic genes. Use tools like CheckM. A contamination level above 5% can lead to erroneous functional predictions.
• Analyze Auxotrophies: Your MAG likely indicates missing biosynthetic pathways for essential vitamins, amino acids, or cofactors. Consult the following table of common auxotrophies and their genomic signatures.

Table 1: Common Microbial Auxotrophies and Genomic Indicators

Auxotrophy For	Key Missing Genes in Pathway	Potential Media Supplement
B Vitamins	bioF, bioB (Biotin); ribA, ribB (Riboflavin, B2)	Yeast extract (0.01-0.05%), soil extract (1-2%)
Amino Acids	trpC, trpD (Tryptophan); leuA, leuB (Leucine)	Casamino acids (0.02%), specific amino acid mix (50 µg/mL)
Heme	hemA, hemL (Heme biosynthesis)	Sterile defibrinated blood (0.5-1%), hemin (10-50 µg/mL)

• Mimic the Natural Environment: The marine environment provides unique micronutrients. Supplement your medium with filter-sterilized seawater or sterile supernatant from a related, successful enrichment culture to provide unknown growth factors [31].
• Adjust Physical Conditions: Confirm that your incubation temperature, pH, and light conditions match the source environment. For anaerobic species, ensure a proper anaerobic chamber or sealed jar with an anaerobic gas pack.

FAQ 2: My target microbe grows very slowly and is consistently outcompeted by faster-growing contaminants. How can I selectively enrich it?

Answer: Selective enrichment is key for slow-growing bacteria. Leverage the metabolic predictions from your MAG to create a selective advantage for your target.

• Use Substrate-Specific Selection: Your MAG's annotation may reveal a unique carbon or nitrogen source utilization potential, such as the ability to degrade complex polysaccharides (e.g., chitin, alginate) or specific aromatic compounds. Use that compound as the sole carbon source in your medium [31].
• Implement Chemical Inhibitors: Add low concentrations of antibiotics or other inhibitors that target common contaminants but not your organism, based on predicted resistance genes (e.g., vancomycin for Gram-negative selection).
• Employ Physical Separation Techniques: Use methods like floating filter cultivation or microcapsule-based cultivation to physically separate slow-growing cells from faster-growing competitors, allowing isolated microcolonies to form [32].

FAQ 3: I suspect my target marine bacterium requires a symbiotic partner. How can I design a co-culture experiment?

Answer: Dependency on other microbes is a major reason for unculturability [31]. A targeted co-culture strategy can overcome this.

• Identify Potential Partners: Analyze your MAG for missing metabolic pathways. Then, screen metagenomic data from the same sample for other microbes that could fill these gaps (e.g., a vitamin producer or a partner that degrades a complex substrate into a simpler one your target can use).
• Design a Cross-Feeding Setup: A straightforward method is to grow the suspected helper strain on one side of a semi-solid medium plate and inoculate your target bacterium on the other, allowing metabolites to diffuse. Alternatively, use a membrane system where the two strains are separated by a permeable membrane.
• Start with a Community Inoculum: If specific partners are unknown, use a highly diluted sample as your inoculum in a medium designed for your target. This can result in microcosms where the necessary cross-feeding partners are present but diversity is low enough to eventually isolate the target.

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Designing a Defined Medium from MAG-predicted Metabolism

This protocol details the creation of a defined medium based on genomic evidence.

Key Research Reagent Solutions:

Reagent	Function
Artificial Seawater Base	Provides essential ions and trace metals (Na+, Mg2+, K+, Ca2+, Cl-, SO42-).
Carbon Source Mix	Based on MAG prediction (e.g., sodium succinate, N-acetylglucosamine, chitin).
Vitamin & Cofactor Supplement	A defined mix of B vitamins, heme, etc., tailored to predicted auxotrophies.
Amino Acid Supplement	A defined mix of specific amino acids if biosynthetic pathways are incomplete.
Reducing Agents	For anaerobes (e.g., cysteine-HCl, thioglycolate).

Methodology:

• Reconstruct Metabolism: Use tools like KEGG and MetaCyc to map the metabolic pathways in your MAG. Identify complete pathways for energy metabolism and incomplete ones for biomass building blocks [31].
• Formulate Base Medium: Start with a defined artificial seawater recipe.
• Add Carbon and Energy Sources: Incorporate the specific carbon source(s) your MAG indicates the organism can utilize (e.g., 5-10 mM).
• Supplement for Gaps: Add the specific amino acids, vitamins, and nucleobases for which biosynthetic pathways are missing, using Table 1 as a guide.
• pH and Redox Adjustment: Adjust the pH to match the source environment (e.g., pH 7.5-8.2 for seawater). For anaerobic microbes, add reducing agents and purge the medium with N2/CO2.
• Sterilize and Inoculate: Filter-sterilize the medium (0.22 µm) to avoid heat-degrading supplements. Inoculate and monitor growth.

Protocol 2: Metagenome-Guided Enrichment and Isolation using Floating Filters

This protocol uses physical separation to isolate slow-growing microbes [32].

Methodology:

• Prepare Enrichment Broth: Create a medium tailored to your target organism's predicted metabolism, as per Protocol 1.
• Inoculate and Pre-enrich: Inoculate the broth with a small amount of the environmental sample (e.g., marine sponge tissue). Incubate with mild shaking for 24-48 hours.
• Transfer to Floating Filter: Aseptically pipet a portion of the pre-enrichment culture onto a sterile filter membrane (e.g., 0.45 µm pore size) floating on a rich, non-selective medium (e.g, Marine Agar broth).
• Incubate for Microcolony Formation: The filter allows diffusion of nutrients and signaling molecules from the underlying medium while physically separating slow-growing cells from fast-growing planktonic cells in the pre-enrichment. Incubate for several weeks.
• Pick and Sub-culture: Periodically examine the filter under a microscope for microcolony formation. Pick individual microcolonies and transfer them to fresh, targeted medium to establish a pure culture.

The following workflow diagram illustrates the strategic process of going from metagenomic data to a purified isolate.

Metagenome-Guided Cultivation Workflow

The following table summarizes the primary data types and how they inform specific cultivation design strategies.

Table 2: Metagenomic Data Informs Cultivation Strategy

Metagenomic Data Type	Information Gained	Corresponding Cultivation Strategy
16S/18S rRNA Gene	Phylogenetic identity, diversity profile.	Guides initial media choice based on known relatives.
Metagenome-Assembled Genome (MAG)	Metabolic potential, biosynthetic capabilities, auxotrophies [31].	Enables design of defined/semi-defined media; suggests selective substrates.
Metatranscriptome	Active metabolic pathways & community interactions in situ [31].	Indicates optimal substrates & conditions; identifies key cross-feeding dependencies.
Single-Amplified Genome (SAG)	Genome from a single, uncultured cell.	Provides a clean metabolic blueprint for media design, free of community contamination.

Advanced Techniques and Future Directions

As the field evolves, new technologies are being integrated with metagenomics to further break down cultivation barriers. For instance, AI-powered tools are now being developed to assist in complex biological design tasks, a concept that could be adapted to predict optimal cultivation conditions from complex genomic data [33]. Furthermore, targeted function-guided screening of metagenomic libraries expressed in heterologous hosts remains a powerful, though challenging, approach to access natural products from uncultured marine microbes [34] [35].

Cultivating anaerobic microorganisms is a cornerstone of environmental and biomedical research, yet it presents a unique set of challenges due to the oxygen sensitivity of these organisms. Overcoming these challenges is particularly crucial within the context of marine microbiology, where an estimated over 99% of microorganisms have not been cultured under standard laboratory conditions [36]. These "microbial dark matter" represent an immense reservoir of unexplored biodiversity with potential for novel bioactive substances, including new antibiotics and anti-tumor agents [36]. The development and precise implementation of specialized anoxic cultivation techniques, such as the Hungate method, are therefore not merely technical exercises but fundamental to expanding our understanding of complex marine ecosystems and unlocking their biotechnological potential. This technical support center provides essential guidance for researchers navigating the complexities of anaerobic cultivation, offering troubleshooting solutions and detailed protocols to overcome the persistent limitations in marine microbial research.

FAQs: Addressing Common Challenges in Anaerobic Cultivation

Q1: Why is my anaerobic culture showing no growth, and how can I troubleshoot this?

A systematic approach is essential for diagnosing the absence of growth in anaerobic cultures. Please consult the table below for common issues and solutions.

Table: Troubleshooting Guide for No Growth in Anaerobic Cultures

Potential Cause	Diagnostic Steps	Corrective Actions
Oxygen Contamination	Check for pink discoloration in media containing resazurin (a redox indicator) [37].	Use pre-reduced anaerobically sterilized (PRAS) media. Ensure all procedures are conducted within an anaerobic chamber or using anaerobic jars [37].
Incorrect Media Composition	Verify that all necessary nutrients and electron acceptors are present.	Use specialized media like reinforced clostridial or peptone yeast extract broth. Supplement with vitamin K1, hemin, or blood as required by your specific organism [37].
Inadequate Sample Collection & Transport	Review how the specimen was collected and stored.	Collect samples with needle/syringe and immediately inject into anaerobic transport vials containing oxygen-free gas to prevent deterioration [38] [39].
Overlooked Long Lag Phases	Maintain cultures for an extended period.	Be aware that some anaerobic enrichments can have lag phases of 6 months or longer before showing visible growth [40].

Q2: What are the fundamental differences between the Hungate Technique and the use of an anaerobic chamber?

The choice between these two primary methods depends on the required stringency, workflow volume, and cost considerations.

Table: Comparison of Primary Anaerobic Cultivation Methods

Feature	Hungate Tube Technique	Anaerobic Chamber
Core Principle	Creates an oxygen-free environment in individual tubes via gassing and sealing [40].	An enclosed glove box filled with an oxygen-free gas mixture (e.g., Nâ‚‚, COâ‚‚, Hâ‚‚) [37].
Best For	Culturing extremophiles and strict anaerobes; broth cultures; long-term storage [37].	High-throughput work; processing multiple samples or agar plates simultaneously [37].
Key Advantage	Superior for maintaining strict anoxic conditions, especially in pressurized tubes (Balch tubes) [40].	Convenience and efficiency for manipulating cultures and performing experiments without exposure to oxygen [37].
Potential Limitation	Can be labor-intensive and requires technical skill for gassing operations [40].	Higher initial cost; potential for oxygen leakage over time [37].

Q3: My digester or enrichment culture is producing excessive foam/scum. What could be the cause?

Foaming is a common operational issue often linked to an imbalance in the microbial community or process parameters.

• Potential Causes: This can result from improper mixing, nutrient deficiencies, or an excessive organic loading rate that leads to the accumulation of surface-active compounds [41].
• Corrective Actions: Regularly inspect and maintain agitators to ensure consistent mixing. Analyze your feedstock for sudden compositional shifts and avoid overloading the system [41]. If foaming persists, it may indicate a deeper imbalance requiring professional diagnostic support.

Essential Protocols for Anaerobic Cultivation

The Hungate Technique for Strict Anaerobes

The Hungate technique, a cornerstone of anaerobic microbiology, relies on the principle of excluding oxygen by using gassing to create and maintain an anoxic environment [40].

Detailed Methodology:

• Media Preparation and Reduction: Prepare media by boiling to drive off dissolved oxygen. During cooling and dispensing, continuously sparge the media with an oxygen-free gas (e.g., Nâ‚‚ or a Nâ‚‚/COâ‚‚ mix). Add a reducing agent, such as cysteine-HCl or sodium sulfide, which chemically binds any residual oxygen [37] [40]. The indicator resazurin (0.0001%) is used to visually confirm anoxic conditions; it turns pink in the presence of oxygen and is colorless when reduced [37].
• Dispensing under Gas: Dispense the pre-reduced media into Hungate tubes (screw-capped tubes with butyl rubber septa) or Balch tubes (for crimped aluminum seals) while maintaining a constant stream of oxygen-free gas over the medium [37] [40].
• Sterilization: Autoclave the tubes with caps loosely tightened, then tighten fully after sterilization once the tubes have cooled.
• Inoculation: Inoculate using a syringe and needle to pierce the rubber septum, ensuring the tip of the needle is within the gas stream to avoid introducing oxygen. For liquid inoculum, the medium can be briefly flushed with oxygen-free gas via a second needle [40].
• Incubation: Incubate the tubes at the appropriate temperature without agitation for strict anaerobes.

Diagram: Workflow of the Classic Hungate Tube Technique

Cultivation of Dormant and "Unculturable" Marine Bacteria

A significant challenge in marine microbiology is that many bacteria are in a dormant or "viable but nonculturable" (VBNC) state, requiring specific resuscitation signals [36].

Detailed Methodology:

• Simulating the Natural Environment:

  • Low-Nutrient Media: Use diluted nutrients or natural seawater-based media to avoid shocking oligotrophic bacteria [36] [42]. Studies have achieved cultivation efficiencies up to 45% using standard marine agar, far exceeding the traditional 1% dogma [42].
  • Extended Incubation: Incubate plates for several weeks to months to allow slow-growing bacteria to form colonies [42].

• Application of Resuscitation Stimuli:

  • Signaling Molecules: Add low concentrations of resuscitation-promoting factors (Rpfs), quorum-sensing molecules, or other signaling compounds to the medium to stimulate the exit from dormancy [36].
  • Metabolic Cofactors: Supplement media with catalase (to degrade Hâ‚‚Oâ‚‚) or siderophores (for iron acquisition) to alleviate environmental stresses [36].
  • Co-culture: Cultivate target strains together with helper bacteria that provide essential metabolites or cross-protection, mimicking natural microbial interactions [36].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Reagents and Materials

Successful anaerobic cultivation depends on the use of specialized reagents and materials to create and maintain an oxygen-free environment.

Table: Essential Research Reagents and Materials for Anaerobic Work

Item	Function/Description	Key Application
Resazurin Indicator	A redox-sensitive dye that turns pink in the presence of oxygen, providing a visual check of anoxic conditions [37].	Quality control for media preparation in all anaerobic systems.
Cysteine-HCl / Sodium Sulfide	Reducing agents that chemically scavenge trace oxygen from culture media, creating a low redox potential [37] [40].	Essential component of PRAS media for the Hungate technique and anaerobic chambers.
Butyl Rubber Stoppers	Made of material with very low oxygen permeability, used to seal Hungate tubes or serum bottles [37] [40].	Maintaining long-term anaerobic conditions in tube cultures.
Pre-reduced Anaerobically Sterilized (PRAS) Media	Media that are boiled, gassed, sealed, and autoclaved to ensure they are oxygen-free upon receipt [37].	Gold standard for ensuring media is not a source of oxygen contamination.
Anaerobic Transport Vials	Vials containing an oxygen-free gas mix (COâ‚‚ or Nâ‚‚) for clinical or environmental sample transport [38] [39].	Preserving viability of anaerobic specimens from the field/clinic to the lab.
Anoxomat / Anaerobic Jars	Systems that automatically evacuate air and replace it with precise anaerobic gas mixtures from jars or pouches [37].	A convenient method for incubating a small number of agar plates.
3-Methyldecanoyl-CoA	3-Methyldecanoyl-CoA, MF:C32H56N7O17P3S, MW:935.8 g/mol	Chemical Reagent
Stearyl arachidonate	Stearyl arachidonate, MF:C38H68O2, MW:556.9 g/mol	Chemical Reagent

Advanced Techniques: Bridging to Marine Microbial Dark Matter

Overcoming the "unculturable" dogma requires innovative methods that more closely mimic the natural environment. The following diagram and table summarize two such advanced approaches.

Diagram: Advanced Cultivation Strategies for Challenging Microbes

Table: Advanced Cultivation Methods for Marine Microorganisms

Technique	Core Principle	Protocol Summary	Key Application
In Situ Cultivation (e.g., iChip, Diffusion Chambers)	Cells are confined in a device with a semi-permeable membrane, which is then returned to the natural environment, allowing diffusion of chemical signals and nutrients [36].	1. Dilute environmental sample. 2. Load into multiple miniature diffusion chambers. 3. Seal chambers and incubate in the original habitat or a simulated one. 4. Retrieve and recover grown cells on lab media [36].	Has enabled the cultivation of previously uncultivable marine bacteria, leading to the discovery of new antibiotics and metabolites [36].
Microfluidic Droplet Cultivation	Encapsulates single microbial cells in nanoliter-sized droplets, which function as independent bioreactors, enabling high-throughput cultivation [36].	1. Generate water-in-oil droplets containing a single cell and growth medium. 2. Incubate the emulsion. 3. Monitor for growth within droplets. 4. Break droplets to retrieve viable cultures of interest [36].	Ideal for cultivating rare bacteria from marine samples and for performing ultra-miniaturized enzyme or antibiotic screening [36].

Optimizing Growth and Yield: Strategic Frameworks for Stubborn Microbes

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

FAQ 1: What are the most common reasons for the failure to culture marine microorganisms in the laboratory? The primary challenge is known as the "great plate count anomaly," where standard microbiological techniques typically cultivate less than 1% of the bacterial diversity observed in marine samples through microscopy [2] [42]. Failure often occurs because laboratory conditions disrupt essential environmental factors, including:

• Disruption of Microbial Consortia: Many marine bacteria rely on metabolic by-products or signaling molecules from other organisms in their natural consortia. Standard pure culture techniques isolate cells from these necessary interactions [2].
• Incorrect Nutrient Profiles: The use of overly rich media or inappropriate substrate combinations can inhibit growth, especially for oligotrophic bacteria adapted to low-nutrient conditions in the open ocean [2].
• Absence of Essential Signals: Laboratory media may lack specific chemical or physical signals, such as those for quorum sensing, that are required to initiate growth [2].

FAQ 2: Beyond simple media supplementation, what advanced strategies can improve cultivation yields? Moving beyond basic nutrient addition, successful strategies focus on mimicking the natural marine environment more closely:

• High-Throughput Techniques: Methods like dilution-to-extinction in low-nutrient media help isolate slow-growing bacteria by reducing competition from fast-growing species [24] [43].
• In Situ Cultivation: Devices like the iChip (isolation chip) allow microbes to be cultured in their natural habitat by using semi-permeable membranes that permit the diffusion of environmental chemicals and growth factors while containing individual cells [24].
• Co-cultivation: Growing target microorganisms together with their natural "helper" bacteria can provide essential nutrients or degrade inhibitory waste products [24] [43]. For example, the cyanobacterium Synechococcus survived longer in batch culture when co-cultured with the bacterium Ruegeria pomeroyi [43].
• Media Gelling Agents: Substituting agar with alternatives like gellan gum can increase the viable count and recovery of bacteria that are uncultured on standard agar [24].

FAQ 3: How can statistical Design of Experiments (DOE) and Response Surface Methodology (RSM) be applied to media optimization? RSM is a powerful statistical DOE technique for optimizing multiple variables simultaneously. A case study on optimizing the fermentation conditions for a fungi fibrinolytic compound (FGFC1) demonstrates its application [44]:

• Procedure: Based on initial single-factor tests, a design software (like Design-Expert) is used to create an experimental matrix.
• Variables and Response: The study analyzed the effects of culture time, ornithine hydrochloride addition, and culture temperature on the yield of FGFC1.
• Outcome: The model identified optimal conditions (7 days culture, 0.5% ornithine, 28°C), resulting in a yield of 1,978.33 mg/L, which closely matched the model's prediction [44]. This method is far more efficient than one-factor-at-a-time experimentation.

Troubleshooting Guides

Problem: Consistently Low Diversity and Yield from Seawater Plating

Potential Causes and Solutions:

Problem Area	Specific Issue	Recommended Solution
Media Formulation	Overly rich, standard laboratory media inhibiting oligotrophic bacteria.	Use low-nutrient, seawater-based media. Sterilize phosphate and agar separately to reduce oxidative stress [24] [2].
Physical Separation	Fast-growing species outcompete slow-growers on standard agar plates.	Implement dilution-to-extinction culturing in liquid media [24] or use microencapsulation methods like gel micro-droplets [2] [43].
Lack of Environmental Cues	Missing chemical or physical signals from the native habitat.	Incorporate signaling compounds like N-acylhomoserine lactones [43] or use diffusion chambers/iChip for in situ cultivation [24].
Sample Handling	Cell damage or death during transport and processing.	Use a protective "survival box" for transport and establish cryogenic protocols for sample preservation [43].

Problem: Optimizing Production of a Target Metabolite in a Isolated Marine Bacterium

Potential Causes and Solutions:

Problem Area	Specific Issue	Recommended Solution
Initial Screening	Suboptimal production under standard screening conditions.	Apply the OSMAC (One Strain Many Compounds) approach, varying media composition, salinity, and aeration to activate silent biosynthetic gene clusters [24].
Process Optimization	Inefficient, one-variable-at-a-time approach to optimizing fermentation.	Employ statistical experimental design (DOE/RSM) to efficiently identify the interaction effects of key factors like carbon source, temperature, and pH, and find the optimal combination [44].
Genetic Potential	Inability to produce novel analogs or increase yield.	Use genome mining to identify biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs). Apply metabolic engineering to optimize yields or express BGCs in a heterologous host [24].

Detailed Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Dilution-to-Extinction Culturing for Oligotrophic Marine Bacteria

Principle: This method serial dilutes a microbial sample to a point where only a few cells are present per well, reducing competition and allowing the growth of slow-growing, oligotrophic species [24] [43].

Materials:

• Filter-sterilized natural seawater (or artificial seawater mimicking the sample site)
• Low-nutrient supplement (e.g., 0.001–0.01% yeast extract, carbon sources like sodium acetate or pyruvate)
• 96-well cell culture plates (sterile)
• Multichannel pipette and sterile reservoirs
• Source water sample

Method:

• Medium Preparation: Prepare a basal medium using filtered, autoclaved natural seawater. Add a very low concentration of organic nutrients (e.g., 10 mg/L of yeast extract and carbon sources).
• Sample Filtration: Pre-filter the water sample through a 1.0-μm pore-size filter to remove larger organisms and particles.
• Serial Dilution: In a sterile 96-well plate, perform a serial dilution of the filtered sample across the rows. Each dilution should be made directly into the low-nutrient medium. A final dilution factor of 10^-4 to 10^-6 is often effective.
• Incubation: Seal the plates to prevent evaporation and incubate at in situ temperature (or a gradient of temperatures) for several weeks to months.
• Monitoring and Isolation: Monitor the wells for turbidity periodically. Sub-culture from positive wells onto solid media or into fresh liquid medium to establish pure cultures.

Protocol 2: Optimizing Metabolite Yield Using Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

Principle: RSM is used to find the optimal levels of critical factors that influence the yield of a target compound (e.g., an enzyme or secondary metabolite) [44].

Materials:

• Pure culture of the microbial strain
• Fermentation media components
• Design of Experiments software (e.g., Design-Expert, Minitab, R)
• Standard equipment for fermentation (shakers, bioreactors) and analyte quantification (HPLC, spectrophotometer)

Method:

• Identify Critical Factors: Use prior knowledge or preliminary single-factor experiments to select 3-4 key variables for optimization (e.g., concentration of Carbon source, Nitrogen source, incubation Temperature, initial pH).
• Design the Experiment: Choose an RSM design such as a Central Composite Design (CCD) or Box-Behnken Design. The software will generate a set of experimental runs with different combinations of factor levels.
• Execute Fermentation: Inoculate and run the fermentation experiments according to the design matrix. Keep all other parameters constant.
• Measure the Response: For each run, quantify the yield of your target metabolite (e.g., FGFC1 yield in mg/L) [44].
• Model and Analyze: Input the response data into the software to fit a quadratic model. The software will provide an equation that describes the relationship between the factors and the response. Analyze the model's statistical significance (p-value, R²).
• Find the Optimum: Use the model's optimization function to identify the factor levels that predict the maximum yield. Conduct a verification experiment at these predicted conditions to validate the model.

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagent Solutions

Table: Essential Reagents and Materials for Advanced Marine Microbe Cultivation

Item	Function/Application
Gellan Gum	An alternative gelling agent to agar; can significantly increase the viable count and recovery of certain marine bacterial taxa that do not grow on agar-based media [24].
Quorum Sensing Molecules (e.g., AHLs)	N-Acylhomoserine lactones are signaling compounds used in cell-to-cell communication. Their addition to culture media can help initiate growth and biofilm formation in previously unculturable strains [43].
MicroDish Culture Chip (MDCC)	A high-throughput microcultivation tool that allows for the simultaneous culture of microbes in thousands of miniature chambers, facilitating the screening of growth conditions [43].
iChip (Isolation Chip)	A miniature diffusion chamber that allows for the in situ cultivation of environmental microbes, giving them access to natural growth factors from their habitat [24].
Cryo-protectants (e.g., Glycerol, DMSO)	Agents used for the long-term cryopreservation of isolated strains at ultra-low temperatures (e.g., -80°C, liquid nitrogen) to ensure culture viability and genetic stability [43].
C6(6-Azido) LacCer	C6(6-Azido) LacCer, MF:C36H66N4O13, MW:762.9 g/mol
Bis-PEG8-NHS ester	Bis-PEG8-NHS ester, MF:C28H44N2O16, MW:664.7 g/mol

Workflow and Signaling Pathway Diagrams

Media Optimization and Cultivation Workflow

Cell-to-Cell Communication in Cultivation

Over 70% of Earth's microbial biomass, predominantly anaerobes, resides in anoxic environments, yet less than 0.1% of anaerobic species have been isolated in pure culture [45]. This "great plate count anomaly" is particularly pronounced in marine microbiology, where conventional cultivation methods favor fast-growing organisms that dominate laboratory conditions [45] [3]. The inability to culture the microbial "rare biosphere"—often comprising slow-growing, low-abundance, or fastidious microorganisms—represents a critical bottleneck in marine natural product discovery and ecological studies [45] [4].

Growth-curve-guided cultivation addresses this limitation through real-time monitoring of microbial growth to identify optimal windows for isolating target organisms before they are outcompeted. This approach leverages fundamental growth kinetics to provide a relative growth advantage to slow-growing microorganisms that would otherwise be lost in traditional enrichment cultures [45]. For researchers working with marine samples, this methodology offers a strategic framework for targeting the uncultivated majority that represents the greatest potential for novel bioactive compound discovery [4].

Technical Foundations: Understanding Microbial Growth Dynamics

The Microbial Growth Curve

Bacterial growth in a closed system follows a characteristic curve with distinct phases: lag, exponential, stationary, and death. During the exponential phase, cell growth follows the differential equation:

dX/dt = μX

Which when solved yields: X(t) = X₀e^(μt)

This can be linearized as: ln(X/X₀) = μt

Where:

• X = cell concentration at time t
• Xâ‚€ = initial cell concentration
• μ = specific growth rate
• t = time [46]

The doubling time (t_d) can be calculated from the growth rate: t_d = ln(2)/μ [46]

Table: Key Growth Parameters for Isolation Strategy

Parameter	Symbol	Significance for Isolation	Calculation Method
Specific Growth Rate	μ	Determines speed of population expansion; slower rates require longer incubation	Slope of ln(OD) vs. time during exponential phase
Doubling Time	t_d	Indicates generation time; critical for timing isolation attempts	t_d = ln(2)/μ
Lag Time	λ	Adaptation period; may be extended for environmental isolates	Duration until exponential growth begins
Maximum Yield	X_max	Carrying capacity; affects dilution strategy	Maximum OD reached

Growth Heterogeneity in Microbial Communities

Marine microbial communities exhibit highly uneven abundance distributions, with a few dominant taxa and a long tail of low-abundance taxa that are often undetectable by traditional cultivation methods [3]. This "rare biosphere" contains microorganisms that may transition between rarity and prevalence depending on environmental conditions [3].

In fragmented microhabitats—such as those found in marine sediments, sponge tissues, or droplet-based systems—interaction outcomes can differ significantly from uniform bulk cultures. Studies with Pseudomonas strains have demonstrated that competitive exclusion observed in well-mixed cultures can be reversed in micro-droplets due to variations in initial cell populations and growth phenotypes [47]. This principle is particularly relevant for marine microbiologists seeking to isolate slow-growing specialists from complex environmental samples.

Experimental Protocols

Protocol 1: Generating a Standard Growth Curve for Marine Isolates

Objective: Monitor bacterial growth over time using spectrophotometric measurements to determine growth rate and doubling time for isolation timing [46].

Materials:

• Filter-sterilized seawater-based medium
• Sterile pipette tips or 1 mL serological pipette
• Two disposable cuvettes
• Parafilm
• Spectrophotometer
• Appropriate liquid growth medium
• Anaerobic chamber or sealed culture tubes (for anaerobes)
• 500 mL culture flask
• Waste beaker

Procedure:

• Inoculum Preparation:

  • Start with an optical density (OD) of approximately 0.1 in fresh medium
  • Calculate volume of inoculum from mother culture using: V_add = (250 mL × 0.3)/(OD_inoc - 0.3)
  • Under aseptic conditions, add calculated volume to 250 mL medium

• Spectrophotometer Setup:

  • Blank spectrophotometer with 600 μL sterile medium
  • For cyanobacteria: use 750 nm wavelength
  • For most other bacteria: use 600 nm wavelength
  • Clean cuvette exterior with Kimwipe before each measurement

• OD Measurements:

  • Take initial OD measurement immediately after inoculation
  • Establish sampling interval based on expected doubling time:
    • Fast-growing isolates: 30-60 minute intervals
    • Slow-growing marine isolates: 2-12 hour intervals
  • For accurate readings, ensure OD remains between 0.1 and 1.0
  • Dilute samples as necessary with sterile medium

• Data Recording:

  • Record time, measured OD, and dilution factor
  • Calculate true OD: OD_true = (OD_measured - OD_medium) × DF

• Growth Analysis:

  • Plot OD_true versus time to visualize growth curve
  • Plot ln(OD_t/OD_0) versus time to identify linear exponential phase
  • Perform linear regression on exponential phase data to determine μ
  • Calculate doubling time: t_d = ln(2)/μ [46]

Growth-Curve-Guided Cultivation Workflow

Protocol 2: Growth-Curve-Guided Isolation of Slow-Growing Marine Bacteria

Objective: Isolate slow-growing marine bacteria by leveraging growth curve data to time isolation procedures before competitive exclusion [45].

Materials:

• Environmental marine sample (sediment, sponge, water)
• Marine broth or defined seawater medium
• Anaerobic workstation (for anaerobes)
• Sterile roll tubes or plates
• Dilution series materials
• PCR reagents for 16S rRNA screening
• Selective agents (if targeting specific taxa)

Procedure:

• Sample Selection and Community Analysis:

  • Assess initial diversity via 16S rRNA gene sequencing
  • Identify target taxa of interest through metagenomic data
  • Design specific probes for target detection [45]

• Primary Enrichment with Growth Monitoring:

  • Inoculate sample into appropriate marine medium
  • Monitor growth kinetics via OD measurements
  • Identify inflection points where slow-growers may be active but not yet outcompeted

• Strategic Sampling and Dilution-to-Extinction:

  • Sample enrichment culture at predetermined timepoints based on growth curve
  • Perform serial dilutions in fresh medium
  • Use highest dilutions that still show growth
  • Repeat process through multiple growth cycles

• Establishment of Selective Conditions:

  • Create conditions that provide relative growth advantage to target
  • Consider temperature, nutrient limitation, or specific inhibitors
  • Use signaling molecules or cofactors identified from genomic data [45]

• Confirmation and Purification:

  • Screen resulting cultures for target organisms
  • Verify purity through repeated streaking and microscopy
  • Confirm identity through 16S rRNA sequencing [45]

Troubleshooting Guides

Common Problems and Solutions in Growth-Curve-Guided Cultivation

Table: Troubleshooting Growth-Curve-Guided Isolation of Marine Microorganisms

Problem	Potential Causes	Solutions	Preventive Measures
No growth in primary enrichment	Toxic oxygen levels (anaerobes); inappropriate medium; microbial community imbalance	Use reduced media with oxygen scavengers; employ in situ cultivation devices; modify nutrient composition	Pre-reduce media in anaerobic chamber; use multiple medium formulations; include signaling molecules
Target organism not detected despite growth	Overgrowth by competitive species; sampling at wrong timepoint	Implement density-based separation pre-enrichment; sample at multiple timepoints; use fluorescence-activated cell sorting	Begin sampling during early exponential phase; use selective inhibitors for fast-growers
Inconsistent growth curves between replicates	Inoculum heterogeneity; habitat fragmentation effects; variable initial cell states	Increase replicate number; use larger initial inoculum; employ droplet-based microcultivation	Standardize inoculation protocol; use single-cell dispensing systems
Growth cessation before isolation possible	Nutrient depletion; toxin accumulation; predator overgrowth	Medium replenishment through fed-batch approach; use porous chambers for metabolite exchange; add inhibitors	Increase initial volume-to-surface ratio; use absorbents for toxic metabolites
Unable to obtain pure culture after dilution	Dependency on co-occurring species; unrecognized symbioses	Shift to co-culture approach; add filtered supernatant from mixed culture; use diffusion chambers	Test various signaling compounds; employ membrane-based separation systems

FAQs: Growth-Curve Strategies for Marine Microorganisms

Q1: What specific growth monitoring techniques are most effective for slow-growing marine anaerobes? Beyond standard OD measurements, consider ATP-based viability assays, flow cytometry with DNA staining, or culture fluorescence for specific metabolic groups. For extremely slow-growing organisms, direct cell counting via microscopy or automated cell imaging systems may be necessary, as turbidity changes might be undetectable for weeks or months [45] [3].

Q2: How can I determine the optimal sampling time for isolation attempts? Sample at multiple points: during early exponential phase (before competitive exclusion), at the transition to stationary phase (when some slow-growers peak), and during secondary growth waves (indicating utilization of alternative substrates). The specific timing should be informed by the growth curve, targeting points where the slope of ln(OD) versus time shows inflection points [45].

Q3: What modifications to standard media improve cultivation of marine slow-growers? Employ gellan gum instead of agar as the gelling agent, which improves recovery of some marine taxa. Reduce phosphate-catalyzed hydrogen peroxide formation by autoclaving phosphate and agar separately (PS media) or adding scavengers like catalase or pyruvate. Use natural seawater base with nutrient concentrations approximating the original environment [4].

Q4: How do I handle suspected obligate syntrophs that won't grow in pure culture? When repeated purification attempts fail despite optimal growth in mixed culture, consider established co-culture systems. Use membrane separations that allow metabolite exchange but prevent cell contact, or employ microfluidic devices that enable controlled interactions between potential partners [47].

Q5: What role does habitat fragmentation play in isolation success? Fragmented microhabitats (achievable through droplet microfluidics or compartmentalization) can reverse competitive outcomes observed in bulk culture. By creating isolated microenvironments with small founder populations, you reduce competition pressure and allow the growth of rare strains that would be excluded in well-mixed conditions [47].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Essential Reagents and Equipment

Table: Key Research Reagents and Equipment for Growth-Curve-Guided Cultivation

Item	Function	Application Notes	Marine-Specific Considerations
Gellan Gum	Alternative gelling agent	Improves cultivability of some marine bacteria compared to agar	Use with artificial seawater base; adjust concentration for optimal hardness
Oxygen Scavengers	Create anaerobic conditions	Essential for obligate anaerobes prevalent in marine sediments	Cysteine-HCl, sodium sulfide, or titanium citrate as reducing agents
Marine Broth Base	General growth medium	Supports diverse marine heterotrophs	Formulate with natural or artificial seawater; adjust salinity to match source environment
Diffusion Chambers	In situ cultivation	Allows chemical exchange with natural environment while containing cells	Deploy in marine environments or simulate in laboratory with flow-through systems
Microfluidic Droplet Generator	Habitat fragmentation	Creates picoliter droplets for single-cell cultivation	Compatible with seawater media; allows high-throughput isolation attempts
Anaerobic Workstation	Oxygen-free manipulation	Essential for strict anaerobes	Maintain appropriate humidity for marine microbes; include temperature control
Phosphate-Separate (PS) Media	Reduces oxidative stress	Prepared by autoclaving phosphate separately from other components	Particularly beneficial for deep-sea isolates sensitive to hydrogen peroxide
Signal Compounds	Stimulate growth initiation	Autoinducers, siderophores, or other signaling molecules	N-acyl homoserine lactones commonly used for marine Gram-negative bacteria

Strategic Solutions for Cultivation Challenges

Advanced Applications in Marine Drug Discovery

The integration of growth-curve-guided cultivation with modern omics technologies has created powerful pipelines for marine natural product discovery. By combining targeted cultivation with genome mining, researchers can prioritize isolates with high biosynthetic potential [4].

Marine sponges, which form unique ecosystems through symbiosis with diverse microbial communities, represent particularly promising targets. These symbiotic microorganisms produce a wealth of bioactive compounds, and growth-curve-guided approaches have enabled the isolation of previously uncultivated taxa [32]. Techniques such as floating filter cultivation, microcapsule-based methods, and in situ incubation systems have successfully recovered novel strains when informed by growth kinetic data [32].

For marine drug development professionals, this integrated approach offers a strategic path to access the vast untapped biosynthetic potential of marine microorganisms. By understanding growth kinetics and applying targeted isolation strategies, researchers can systematically explore microbial dark matter with increased efficiency and success rates.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: What is the primary reason many marine microorganisms do not produce novel compounds in standard lab cultures? A1: In standard monoculture conditions, many biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) responsible for producing secondary metabolites remain "silent" or "cryptic" [48] [49]. These genes are often only activated in response to specific environmental stimuli or biological interactions, such as those encountered in their complex natural habitats. Co-cultivation aims to mimic these competitive or symbiotic interactions, triggering the activation of these dormant pathways [49].

Q2: What are the expected outcomes when I set up a co-culture experiment? A2: Co-culture experiments can lead to one of three general outcomes, which should guide your experimental planning and analysis:

• Increased Yield: Enhancement in the production of known bioactive compounds or overall extract bioactivity [16].
• Dereplication: Production of known compounds that were not detected in the axenic (single-strain) cultures of either partner [16].
• Novel Compound Production: Synthesis of entirely new secondary metabolites that were previously unknown [48] [16].

Q3: How do I select which microorganisms to pair in a co-culture? A3: Pairing can be guided by ecological rationale or systematic screening:

• Ecological Basis: Co-culture microorganisms that are known to interact in nature, such as symbionts from the same host (e.g., sponge-associated bacteria and fungi) or competitors from the same ecological niche [24] [48].
• Systematic Screening: Use high-throughput methods to screen your target strain against a library of potential microbial partners to identify interactions that induce metabolic changes [49] [43]. Often, pairing phylogenetically distant strains, such as a bacterium with a fungus, can be particularly effective [48].

Q4: Beyond co-culture, what other strategies can activate silent gene clusters? A4: Several cultivation-based and genetic strategies can be employed, often in combination:

• OSMAC (One Strain Many Compounds): Altering cultivation parameters such as medium composition, salinity, temperature, aeration, or the use of solid vs. liquid media [24] [48].
• Elicitor Supplementation: Adding small molecule elicitors like epigenetic modifiers (e.g., DNA methyltransferase or histone deacetylase inhibitors) or hormone-like signals to the culture medium [48] [49].
• Genetic Engineering: Utilizing heterologous expression, ribosome engineering, or CRISPR-based genome editing to directly activate or manipulate silent BGCs [24] [49].

Troubleshooting Guides

Problem 1: No Observable Metabolic Induction or Bioactivity in Co-culture

Possible Causes and Solutions:

• Cause: Incompatible Microbial Partners or Lack of Communication.
  • Solution: Re-evaluate partner selection. Consider using a more diverse set of challenger organisms. Implement a high-throughput screening method, such as microtiter plate-based assays, to quickly identify productive interactions [43].
• Cause: Suboptimal Cultivation Conditions.
  • Solution: Systematically optimize physical and nutritional parameters. Refer to the Experimental Protocols section (Table 2) for key factors to test. The use of automated systems that vary light, temperature, and pressure can be beneficial [43].
• Cause: Analytical Methods Lack Sensitivity.
  • Solution: Employ advanced metabolomic approaches like LC-MS/MS with molecular networking. This technique can detect subtle changes in the metabolic profile and help identify novel compounds, even in complex extracts [24] [16].

Problem 2: One Microbial Partner Overgrows the Other

Possible Causes and Solutions:

• Cause: Significant Growth Rate Disparity.
  • Solution: Use physical separation methods like diffusion chambers or membrane filters that allow the exchange of signaling molecules and metabolites while preventing direct contact and overgrowth [24] [49]. Another strategy is to inoculate the faster-growing partner at a lower cell density or at a later time point [16].
• Cause: Medium Favors One Partner.
  • Solution: Develop a compromise medium that supports minimal growth for both partners. A low-nutrient medium can sometimes better simulate natural conditions and encourage chemical interaction over rapid growth [49].

Problem 3: Difficulty in Reproducing Co-culture Results

Possible Causes and Solutions:

• Cause: Inconsistent Inoculation or Cultivation Parameters.
  • Solution: Establish a highly standardized and documented protocol. Precisely control the initial inoculum size (e.g., using optical density measurements), age of the pre-culture, temperature, agitation, and light conditions for every experiment [16].
• Cause: Uncontrolled Minor Environmental Fluctuations.
  • Solution: Use highly controlled bioreactors or incubators where parameters like temperature and agitation are tightly maintained. For small-scale cultures, ensure consistent positioning in shaking incubators [43].

Experimental Protocols for Key Methodologies

Table 1: Standard Liquid Medium Co-culture Protocol

Step	Action	Technical Details & Considerations
1	Prepare Axenic Pre-cultures	Grow each microbial strain individually in an appropriate liquid medium to mid-exponential phase. Ensure culture purity.
2	Standardize Inoculum	Adjust the cell density of each pre-culture (e.g., to a specific OD600). Determine the optimal inoculation ratio (e.g., 1:1) and sequence (simultaneous vs. staggered).
3	Inoculate Co-culture	Transfer the standardized inocula into fresh, suitable culture medium. Always set up corresponding axenic control cultures under identical conditions.
4	Incubate	Incubate under defined conditions (temperature, agitation, light). The duration may need optimization but often ranges from 3 to 14 days.
5	Monitor Interaction	Periodically check for morphological changes, pigmentation, or biofilm formation. Sample for metabolomic analysis at multiple time points.
6	Extract Metabolites	Harvest cultures by centrifugation or filtration. Extract metabolites from both the biomass and the culture supernatant using solvents like ethyl acetate or methanol.
7	Analyze and Compare	Analyze co-culture and control extracts using HPLC, LC-MS, and bioassays to identify induced or enhanced metabolites and bioactivities [16].

Table 2: OSMAC Approach for Metabolic Elicitation

Factor to Manipulate	Examples	Expected Impact
Nutritional Source	Varying carbon (glycerol, glucose) and nitrogen (yeast extract, peptone) sources [48] [16].	Alters central metabolism, potentially redirecting flux to secondary metabolite pathways.
Physical State	Solid (agar) vs. liquid culture; static vs. agitated conditions [48] [16].	Affers oxygen transfer, cell-to-cell contact, and differentiation, inducing different BGCs.
Salinity	Modulating the concentration of sea salt or sodium chloride in the medium [48].	Mimics native habitat and can trigger stress responses linked to secondary metabolism.
Elicitors	Adding sub-inhibitory concentrations of antibiotics, heavy metals, or signaling molecules [48] [49].	Induces general stress response or mimics ecological competition, activating silent BGCs.

Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Reagents and Materials for Co-culture Studies

Item	Function / Application	Specific Examples
Gellan Gum	A superior gelling agent for solid media, often increasing the viable count and recovery of marine bacteria compared to traditional agar [24].	-
iChip (Isolation Chip)	A miniature diffusion chamber device for high-throughput in situ cultivation and co-cultivation, allowing environmental solute exchange [24].	Used to identify new antibiotics like teixobactin from previously uncultured bacteria [24].
Epigenetic Modifiers	Small molecules that alter gene expression by inhibiting DNA methyltransferases or histone deacetylases, leading to the activation of silent BGCs [48].	5-Azacytidine, Suberoyl Bis-hydroxamic Acid [48].
Diffusion Chambers	Permits chemical exchange between microbes while preventing physical contact, useful for studying signaling and preventing overgrowth [24] [49].	Can be constructed using membranes with specific pore sizes (e.g., 0.1 µm) [24].
Catalase / Pyruvate	Scavenging agents added to growth media to reduce hydrogen peroxide accumulation, which can improve the cultivability of sensitive marine isolates [24].	-

Signaling and Workflow Diagrams

Co-culture Induction Pathway

Experimental Workflow

Troubleshooting Guide: Culturing Marine Extremophiles

Problem: No Growth or Extremely Slow Growth in Thermophilic Cultures

• Potential Cause 1: Inadequate Temperature Stability.
  • Solution: Ensure water baths or incubators are accurately calibrated and have minimal temperature fluctuations. For hyperthermophiles, use specialized heated blocks or ovens that can maintain temperatures above 80°C [50] [51].
• Potential Cause 2: Lack of Essential Metabolic Adaptations.
  • Solution: Supplement media with salts like potassium and magnesium, which are known to contribute to the thermostability of cellular components [50]. Verify that the media includes sulfur or other inorganic compounds if cultivating chemolithoautotrophic organisms [50].
• Potential Cause 3: Oxygen Sensitivity in Anaerobic Thermophiles.
  • Solution: Use anaerobic chambers or sealed culture tubes with an anaerobic gas mix. Add reducing agents such as cysteine-HCl or sodium sulfide to the medium to remove dissolved oxygen [51].

Problem: Cell Lysis in Halophilic or Osmophilic Cultures

• Potential Cause: Osmotic Shock Due to Improper Salt or Sugar Concentration.
  • Solution: Always acclimatize cultures gradually to the target osmotic condition. Use a stepwise gradient when transferring cultures to higher salinity/solute media. Ensure the medium contains the appropriate compatible solutes (e.g., betaines, amino acids, trehalose) or high concentrations of inorganic ions to support internal osmotic balance [50] [51].

Problem: Failure to Induce Secondary Metabolite Production

• Potential Cause: Silent Gene Clusters Under Standard Lab Conditions.
  • Solution: Implement a co-culture (mixed-fermentation) strategy. Inoculating your target strain with a "helper" or competing microorganism can mimic natural ecological interactions and activate silent biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) [48]. Alternatively, use the OSMAC (One Strain Many Compounds) approach by varying culture parameters like medium composition, salinity, or temperature [48].

Problem: Inability to Culture Dominant but "Unculturable" Bacteria

• Potential Cause: Prolonged Lag Phase or Missing Biotic Factors.
  • Solution: Simulate the natural environment more closely. Use filtered seawater as a base for the medium and consider adding signaling molecules or substrates produced by symbiotic "helper" microbes, as suggested by the Black Queen Hypothesis [21]. For rare active bacteria, use high-throughput techniques like culturomics [21].

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: What are the key physiological differences between thermophiles, psychrophiles, and halophiles? The key differences lie in their biomolecular adaptation strategies, summarized in the table below.

Table 1: Adaptive Mechanisms in Marine Extremophiles

Extremophile Type	Defining Condition	Key Membrane Adaptations	Key Protein & Enzyme Adaptations	Other Protective Mechanisms
Thermophile	High temperature (45-122°C) [50]	Saturated fatty acids; Ether-linked lipids (in Archaea) for heat resistance [50] [51]	Thermostable proteins with more hydrophobic cores and ionic bonds; Heat shock proteins (HSPs) as molecular chaperones [50]	Reverse DNA gyrase for positive supercoiling; High GC content; High intracellular K+/Mg2+ [50]
Psychrophile	Low temperature (often <15°C) [51]	Unsaturated fatty acids for membrane fluidity [51]	Cold-adapted enzymes with high catalytic efficiency at low temperatures; Cold shock proteins [51]	Production of antifreeze proteins and exopolysaccharides [51]
Halophile/ Osmophile	High salinity/Osmotic pressure [50] [51]	Modified lipid composition for stability [51]	Enzymes stable and functional at high salt concentrations (high isoelectric point) [50]	Accumulation of compatible solutes (e.g., betaines, trehalose) or inorganic ions for osmotic balance [50] [51]

Q2: How can I experimentally access the vast secondary metabolite potential of unculturable marine microbes? Metagenomics provides a powerful, culture-independent approach [52]. This involves:

• Extracting total environmental DNA from a marine sample (e.g., seawater, sediment, or a host organism like a sponge).
• Sequencing the DNA using Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies [53].
• Bioinformatic Analysis: Using specialized tools like antiSMASH or DeepBGC to identify Biosynthetic Gene Clusters (BGCs) in the sequenced DNA that are responsible for producing secondary metabolites [52].
• Heterologous Expression: Cloning these BGCs into a culturable, laboratory-friendly host bacterium (e.g., E. coli) to express and produce the target metabolites [52] [48].

Q3: What is the rationale behind using co-culture to induce novel metabolite production? In their natural habitats, microbes exist in complex communities and are constantly engaged in symbiotic or competitive interactions [48]. Standard lab monoculture fails to replicate these biological stresses. Co-culture reintroduces this interplay, creating a "stress factor" that can trigger the activation of silent gene clusters—genes not expressed in monoculture—leading to the production of novel secondary metabolites [48].

Q4: Are there databases for known biosynthetic gene clusters? Yes, several databases are crucial for this field:

• MiBiG (Minimum Information about a Biosynthetic Gene cluster): A curated repository of experimentally characterized BGCs [52].
• BiG-FAM: A database containing over a million predicted BGCs from public genomes and metagenomes, useful for comparative analysis [52].

---

Experimental Protocol: Activation via Co-Culture

Title: Mixed-Fermentation to Activate Silent Biosynthetic Gene Clusters

Objective: To induce the production of novel secondary metabolites in a target marine microorganism by co-culturing it with a competing or symbiotic strain.

Materials:

• Pure cultures of the target marine bacterium/fungus.
• Pure culture of an inducer strain (e.g., Bacillus subtilis or another marine isolate).
• Appropriate liquid and solid marine media (e.g., Marine Broth, Modified Czapek with sea salt) [48].
• Erlenmeyer flasks.
• Orbital shaker incubator.

Methodology:

• Pre-culture: Grow pure cultures of the target and inducer strains separately in liquid marine medium for 24-48 hours under optimal conditions [48].
• Inoculation:
  • Test Co-culture: Inoculate the main culture flask with both the target and inducer strains simultaneously. A 1:1 inoculum ratio is a common starting point [48].
  • Control Monocultures: Inoculate separate flasks with each strain alone.
• Incubation: Incubate all flasks under identical conditions (temperature, agitation, duration) suitable for the target organism.
• Extraction: After the incubation period, extract the metabolites from the culture broth and/or biomass of all cultures using an organic solvent like ethyl acetate.
• Analysis: Analyze and compare the chemical profiles of the co-culture extracts with the monoculture extracts using techniques like HPLC-MS or TLC. The appearance of new peaks in the co-culture chromatogram indicates induced metabolite production [48].

Workflow Visualization:

---

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagent Solutions

Table 2: Essential Reagents and Materials for Culturing Marine Extremophiles

Item	Function / Application
Filtered Natural Seawater	Base for culture media to simulate natural abiotic environment and provide essential trace elements and ions [21].
Compatible Solutes (e.g., Betaine, Ectoine, Trehalose)	Added to media to help halophiles and osmophiles maintain osmotic balance without inhibiting enzyme function [50] [51].
Gradient Plates	Used for gradual acclimatization of cultures to extreme conditions like high salinity, temperature, or pH, preventing osmotic shock [51].
Chemical Elicitors (e.g., 5-Azacytidine)	Epigenetic modifiers used to activate silent gene clusters by altering DNA methylation or histone acetylation, thereby inducing secondary metabolite production [48].
Heat-Stable Enzymes (e.g., polymerases)	Essential for molecular biology work (e.g., PCR) on DNA extracts from thermophiles, as standard enzymes denature at high temperatures [50] [51].
High-Pressure Reactors (Bioreactors)	Specialized equipment for cultivating piezophilic (pressure-loving) microorganisms isolated from deep-sea environments [51].
antiSMASH Software	A key bioinformatic tool for the genomic identification and analysis of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters (BGCs) in sequenced DNA [52].
Gel Microdroplets or Microfluidics	High-throughput cultivation devices used to isolate rare active bacteria by encapsulating single cells in a simulated natural environment [21].

Validating Success: From Community Analysis to Functional Potential Assessment

FAQ 1: Why is there no universal method for cultivating all marine microorganisms?

Marine microorganisms are not a single homogenous group; they have vastly different physiological states, abundance levels, and environmental dependencies. Attempting to use a single cultivation technique, such as standard plate counts, fails to capture this immense diversity. The concept known as the "great plate count anomaly" highlights that traditionally, less than 1% of marine microbes observed under a microscope can be cultured in the lab [3] [42].

The failure of a one-size-fits-all approach stems from three core challenges:

• Diverse Physiological States: Microbes exist on a spectrum from active and growing to dormant. Dormant cells, often called viable but non-culturable (VBNC), will not form colonies on standard media but may be resuscitated with specific stimuli [21] [54].
• Vastly Different Nutrient and Environmental Needs: An organism thriving in a nutrient-poor (oligotrophic) open ocean has fundamentally different requirements than one from a nutrient-rich hydrothermal vent. Standard lab media are often too nutrient-rich, inhibiting the growth of oligotrophs [21] [42].
• Complex Inter-Species Dependencies: Many microbes live in symbiotic relationships, relying on metabolites or signaling molecules from other species. Isolating them in pure culture severs these critical lifelines [21] [55].

Consequently, successful cultivation requires a targeted strategy based on the specific group of microbes you aim to isolate. The table below categorizes the main groups and their core challenges.

Table 1: Categorization of Uncultured Marine Microbes and Their Cultivation Challenges

Target Microbial Group	Defining characteristic	Primary Cultivation Challenge
Dominant Active Bacteria	High abundance in their native environment [21].	Inability to replicate essential environmental conditions (e.g., specific nutrients, pH, signaling molecules) in the lab, leading to a prolonged lag phase or no growth [21].
Rare Active Bacteria	Low abundance in the environment, but metabolically active [21].	Standard dilution and plating techniques are statistically unlikely to capture these rare cells [21].
Dormant Bacteria (VBNC)	Metabolically active but non-dividing; a survival state [21] [54].	Require specific resuscitation stimuli to exit dormancy and become culturable again [54].
Many Archaeal Lineages	Require unique physicochemical conditions (e.g., high salinity, temperature, pressure) [55].	Poorly understood growth requirements and often very slow growth rates that are impractical for standard methods [55].

FAQ 2: My standard plating methods are consistently failing. What advanced cultivation strategies should I consider?

When conventional methods fail, your strategy must evolve. The following troubleshooting guide matches specific failure scenarios with advanced, targeted techniques.

Table 2: Troubleshooting Guide: Matching Cultivation Techniques to Specific Challenges

Problem Scenario	Recommended Technique	Detailed Experimental Protocol	Underlying Principle
Suspected overgrowth by fast-growing species, missing slow-growers or symbionts.	Co-culture / Helper Strains [21] [54].	1. Isolate a helper strain (e.g., a fast-growing bacterium from the same environment).2. Prepare a lawn of the helper strain on a low-nutrient marine agar plate.3. Inoculate the environmental sample in a central spot or streak it across the lawn.4. Incubate for extended periods (weeks to months) and look for microcolonies forming in the vicinity of the helper strain.	Mimics natural syntrophic interactions. The helper strain provides essential metabolites or growth factors that the target microbe cannot produce itself [21].
Unable to replicate the natural chemical environment; standard media are too rich or incorrect.	Diffusion Chambers (e.g., iChip) / In Situ Cultivation [56] [54].	1. Dilute the environmental sample (e.g., seawater, sediment slurry) in a sterile buffer.2. Mix the dilution with warm, low-gelling-point agarose.3. Inject the mixture into a miniature diffusion chamber device with semi-permeable membranes.4. Seal the device and incubate it in the natural environment from which the sample was taken for several weeks.5. Retrieve the device and harvest the formed colonies.	Allows continuous diffusion of natural environmental chemicals and signaling molecules into the incubation chamber, providing an inexact but highly effective simulation of the native habitat [54].
Targeting rare cells from a complex community.	High-Throughput Culturomics & Dilution-to-Extinction [21] [42].	1. Serially dilute the sample in a sterile, nutrient-poor medium to extinction (e.g., 1-10 cells per well).2. Dispense the high dilutions into hundreds of wells of a 96-well plate.3. Incubate for months, monitoring for turbidity with a plate reader.4. Sub-culture positive wells onto solid media.	By drastically diluting the sample, this method reduces competition from dominant species and increases the probability of isolating low-abundance microbes that would otherwise be outcompeted [21] [42].
Attempting to culture dormant (VBNC) cells.	Resuscitation Culture [21] [54].	1. Concentrate cells from water samples via gentle filtration.2. Resuspend the cells in a minimal resuscitation broth supplemented with resuscitation-promoting factors (e.g., RPMI 1640 medium with sodium pyruvate, or spent medium from a related culturable strain).3. Incubate with mild agitation for 1-2 weeks.4. Plate small aliquots periodically onto appropriate solid media to check for culturability.	Uses specific chemical signals (e.g., Rpf, quorum-sensing molecules) or nutrients to "awaken" dormant cells and trigger cell division, restoring their ability to form colonies [54].

The following workflow diagram synthesizes these strategies into a logical decision-making process for planning your cultivation experiments.

Cultivation Strategy Selection Workflow

The Scientist's Toolkit: Key Research Reagent Solutions

Beyond strategy, success hinges on having the right tools. The following table details essential reagents and materials for implementing the advanced methods discussed.

Table 3: Essential Reagents and Materials for Advanced Marine Microbe Cultivation

Reagent / Material	Function / Application	Key Considerations
Filtered Natural Seawater	Base for culture media to simulate natural abiotic environment [21].	Must be filter-sterilized (0.22 µm) to remove native cells while retaining dissolved chemicals. Source consistency is critical.
Resuscitation Promoting Factor (Rpf)	Recombinant protein used to resuscitate and stimulate growth of dormant (VBNC) bacterial cells [54].	Effective at very low concentrations (pM). Specificity varies; may require testing of different Rpf types.
Gel Microdroplets / Microfluidic Devices	For high-throughput single-cell encapsulation and cultivation, enabling growth of rare cells [56].	Allows for miniaturized culture in picolitre volumes, facilitating massive parallelization and screening.
Semi-Permeable Membranes	Key component of diffusion chambers (e.g., iChip) for in situ cultivation [54].	Pore size (e.g., 0.03 - 0.2 µm) must allow passage of nutrients and signals but block contaminants.
Low-Gelling-Temperature Agarose	Used for gel microdroplets and soft agar matrices for gentle cell encapsulation [56].	Melts and gels at low temperatures (~30°C), preventing thermal shock to sensitive marine microbes.
Quorum Sensing Molecules (e.g., AHLs, AIPs)	Used to stimulate growth and resuscitation in bacteria that rely on population density signaling [54].	Different microbial groups use different signaling molecules; identification may require prior metagenomic data.
Selective Metabolic Inhibitors	To inhibit the growth of eukaryotic fungi or bacterial groups, enriching for target archaea or bacteria [55].	Common examples include cycloheximide (for fungi) and specific antibiotics. Must be validated for non-target effects.
Marine Agar & Broth (Various Strengths)	Standard nutritious media, often used at 1/10 or 1/100 strength to cultivate oligotrophs [42].	Full-strength media are often too rich; dilution is a simple first step to isolate previously uncultured oligotrophs.

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

Q1: Why is the DNA extraction method so critical in metagenomic studies of marine samples? The DNA extraction method introduces significant taxonomic biases because different microbial groups have varying cell wall structures and compositions, leading to differential lysis efficiency. Studies have quantitatively shown that different DNA extraction methods can share as little as 29.9–52.0% of the total operational taxonomic units (OTUs) recovered, meaning over half of the identified microbial community can vary based on the extraction method alone [57]. Enzymatic lysis methods often recover higher eubacterial DNA, while mechanical lysis can be more effective for tough-to-lyse Gram-positive organisms, drastically influencing the perceived community structure [57] [58].

Q2: What is the "great plate count anomaly" and how does metagenomics address it? The "great plate count anomaly" refers to the observation that traditional agar plate techniques typically allow for the growth of only about 0.1–1% of bacterial cells observed under a microscope from environmental samples [42]. Metagenomics bypasses cultivation entirely by sequencing genetic material directly from the environment. This culture-independent approach has been pivotal in revealing the vast "microbial dark matter," with one recent global ocean study recovering 43,191 metagenome-assembled genomes (MAGs), a significant proportion of which (over 43% at the species level) could not be assigned to any known taxon [12].

Q3: How can I assess if my DNA extraction method is introducing significant bias? A robust method is to use a combination of quantitative PCR (qPCR) and community profiling. Calculate the "specific recovery" – the number of microbial (e.g., 16S rRNA) gene copies per microgram of total DNA recovered. This metric helps distinguish between total DNA yield and the actual abundance of microbial DNA, as some methods may co-extract high levels of non-microbial background DNA (e.g., from a host or sediment), which can skew results [57]. Additionally, comparing the alpha-diversity (e.g., Shannon's diversity) and community structure (via PCA) resulting from different extraction methods on the same sample can visually and statistically reveal biases [57] [58].

Q4: What are "kitomes" and "splashomes," and how do I control for them? "Kitome" refers to the set of contaminating microbial taxa inherent in the reagents of a DNA purification kit. "Splashome" refers to laboratory and environmental contaminants introduced during sample processing [58]. To control for them, it is essential to process negative control samples (e.g., blank extractions with no sample) in parallel with your experimental samples. Sequencing these controls allows you to identify contaminating sequences, which can then be bioinformatically filtered from your dataset, although complete removal is challenging [58]. Compliance with aseptic practices and sterilization of equipment is also crucial.

Q5: Beyond DNA extraction, what are other major sources of bias in metagenomic analysis? Other significant sources of bias include:

• Sample Storage and Handling: Poor storage can lead to DNA degradation and cell lysis [58].
• Sequencing Platform and Depth: Different platforms and sequencing depths can affect the detection of low-abundance taxa [59].
• Bioinformatic Analysis: Choices in assembly algorithms, binning methods, and reference databases can all influence the final genomic and functional output [52] [59]. The use of standardized computational pipelines is recommended for reproducibility.

Troubleshooting Guides

Issue 1: Low Microbial DNA Yield from a Complex Marine Sample

Problem: The quantity of DNA purified from a marine sediment or host-associated sample is insufficient for shotgun sequencing, or the microbial DNA is dwarfed by eukaryotic host/environmental DNA.

Solutions:

• Kit Selection: For sediments or samples with high humic acid content, use kits specifically designed with Inhibitor Removal Technology (e.g., QIAamp PowerFecal Pro kit, DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit) [58].
• Pre-treatment for Host-Associated Samples: If working with a host organism (e.g., oyster digestive tract), employ a kit that includes a step to selectively lyse and degrade host nucleic acids, such as the QIAamp DNA Microbiome Kit, which uses benzonase [58].
• Verify Specific Recovery: Use qPCR to target the 16S rRNA gene to confirm that your yield of microbial DNA is adequate, even if total DNA seems low [57].

Issue 2: Community Profile Skewed Against Gram-Positive Bacteria

Problem: Your metagenomic data shows an unexpectedly low abundance of Firmicutes (e.g., Bacillaceae) or Actinomycetota, which are known to be present.

Solutions:

• Incorporate Mechanical Lysis: Ensure your DNA extraction protocol includes a bead-beating step. Gram-positive bacteria have thick peptidoglycan layers that are often resistant to enzymatic or chemical lysis alone [57] [58].
• Combine Lysis Principles: Use a method that integrates enzymatic, chemical, and mechanical lysis for the most comprehensive cell disruption [57]. Studies show mechanical bead-beating can recover different and often greater microbial diversity compared to non-mechanical methods [57].

Issue 3: Inability to Link Metagenomic Potential to Cultivable Isolates

Problem: You have identified fascinating biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) in your metagenomic data but cannot isolate the microorganisms that host them.

Solutions:

• Advanced Cultivation Techniques: Move beyond standard direct plating. Techniques like co-culture with other bacteria, dilution-to-extinction, and using diffusion chambers that allow nutrient exchange with the natural environment can help grow "uncultivable" organisms [42].
• Heterologous Expression: Clone the identified BGC into a culturable host bacterium (e.g., E. coli or Streptomyces) for expression and production of the predicted secondary metabolite [52] [60]. This is a core function-driven method to bypass cultivation.
• Culturomics: Apply a high-throughput approach using a vast array of culture conditions and media to maximize the diversity of isolates from a single sample [42].

Data Presentation: Quantifying Method-Dependent Biases

Table 1: Performance Comparison of DNA Extraction Methods Across Marine Sample Types

Data synthesized from comparative studies quantifying yield, microbial recovery, and diversity [57] [58].

Extraction Method Principle	Recommended Sample Type	Average DNA Yield	Efficiency for Gram-Negative Bacteria	Efficiency for Gram-Positive Bacteria	Notes
Enzymatic Lysis	Water, Low-biomass water	High	High	Low	Higher recovery of eubacterial DNA; effective for lactic acid bacteria [57].
Mechanical Bead-Beating	Sediments, Tissues	Moderate	Moderate	High	Essential for tough-to-lyse cells; recovers higher yeast richness and diversity [57] [58].
Chemical Lysis	Water	Low to Moderate	High	Low	May underrepresent Firmicutes and Actinomycetota [57].
Combined (Enzymatic+Mechanical)	Complex samples (Sediments, Host tissues)	Highest	High	High	Most comprehensive approach; minimizes bias by leveraging multiple lysis principles [57] [58].

Table 2: Global Marine Metagenomic Catalogs Highlighting "Uncultured" Diversity

Data derived from large-scale marine metagenome assembly studies [12] [61].

Genome Catalog Feature	GOMC (Global Ocean Microbiome Catalogue)	Seamount Sediment MAGs (Western Pacific)
Total MAGs Recovered	43,191	117 (Medium-quality)
Novelty (Unassigned at Species Level)	20,295 MAGs (43.4%)	81.9% lacked species-level annotation
Key Novel Phyla/Classes Expanded	Thermoproteota, Halobacteriota, Campylobacterota, Desulfobacterota	Proteobacteria, Thaumarchaeota
Primary Sample Sources	Bathypelagic zone, Sediments, Host-associated	Seamount surface sediments

Experimental Protocols for Validation

Protocol 1: Benchmarking DNA Isolation Methods

Objective: To systematically evaluate and select the optimal DNA isolation method for a specific marine sample type.

Materials:

• Homogenized marine sample (water, sediment, or tissue).
• Selected commercial DNA isolation kits (e.g., Qiagen DNeasy PowerSoil Pro, QIAamp DNA Microbiome Kit, PureLink Microbiome DNA Purification Kit) [58].
• Equipment: Bead beater, centrifuge, Nanodrop spectrophotometer, Qubit Fluorometer, PCR machine.

Method:

• Sample Processing: Divide the homogenized sample into aliquots for each DNA extraction method to be tested. Include a negative control for each kit.
• DNA Extraction: Perform extractions in parallel, strictly adhering to each manufacturer's protocol.
• Quality and Quantity Assessment:
  • Measure DNA concentration and purity (A260/280 and A260/230 ratios) using a spectrophotometer.
  • Quantify total DNA more accurately using a fluorescence-based method (Qubit).
• Microbial DNA Recovery:
  • Perform qPCR targeting the bacterial 16S rRNA gene and fungal ITS or LSU gene.
  • Calculate the "specific recovery" (gene copies/μg total DNA) [57].
• Community Analysis:
  • Perform 16S rRNA amplicon sequencing (e.g., Illumina MiSeq) on all extracts.
  • Analyze and compare alpha-diversity (Shannon, Chao1) and beta-diversity (PCoA) between methods.
• Contamination Check: Compare sequencing results from negative controls ("kitome") to identify and subsequently filter out contaminating taxa from the experimental data [58].

Protocol 2: Integrating Culturomics with Metagenomics

Objective: To cultivate a greater proportion of the microbial community detected by metagenomic sequencing.

Materials:

• Marine sample.
• Diverse culture media (Marine Agar, R2A Marine, media with various carbon sources).
• Equipment: Anaerobic chambers, diffusion chambers, microplate readers.

Method:

• Metagenomic Snapshot: First, conduct a metagenomic analysis of the sample to understand the predominant and rare microbial taxa.
• High-Throughput Cultivation:
  • Dilution-to-Extinction: Serially dilute the sample and inoculate into low-nutrient liquid media in 96-well plates to simulate oligotrophic conditions [42].
  • Co-culture: Inoculate samples on plates containing a "helper" strain or culture filtrate to provide missing growth factors.
  • Extended Incubation: Incubate plates for several weeks to months to allow slow-growing bacteria to form colonies.
• Identification and Comparison:
  • Identify isolates via 16S rRNA gene sequencing.
  • Compare the taxonomic profile of your culture collection with the initial metagenomic profile to assess the coverage and identify any taxa uniquely captured by cultivation [42].

Mandatory Visualization

Diagram 1: Metagenomic Validation Workflow for Assessing Cultivation Bias

Workflow for Assessing Cultivation Bias

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table 3: Essential Reagents and Kits for Metagenomic Validation Studies

Item Name	Function/Application	Key Feature
DNeasy PowerSoil Pro Kit (Qiagen)	DNA purification from tough environmental samples.	Inhibitor Removal Technology for humic acids and other PCR inhibitors; includes bead beating [58].
QIAamp DNA Microbiome Kit (Qiagen)	Selective isolation of microbial DNA from host-associated samples.	Includes a benzonase step to degrade host (eukaryotic) DNA and RNA [58].
antiSMASH Software	In silico identification and analysis of Biosynthetic Gene Clusters (BGCs).	Predicts type and boundaries of BGCs (e.g., for non-ribosomal peptide synthetases, polyketide synthases) from genomic data [52] [60].
MIBiG Database	Repository for curated data on BGCs and their metabolites.	Allows comparison and annotation of discovered BGCs against a reference dataset of known clusters [52].
Marine Metagenomics Portal (MarRef, MarDB)	Marine-specific genomic and metagenomic reference databases.	Provides context for marine-derived sequences, enhancing annotation accuracy [62].
Heterologous Expression Hosts (e.g., E. coli, Streptomyces spp.)	Functional validation of predicted BGCs.	Allows for the production and characterization of compounds from gene clusters of uncultured organisms [60].

FAQ: Addressing Common Challenges in Marine Microbe Research

Why are most marine microorganisms considered "unculturable," and what does this term actually mean?

The concept of "unculturability," more accurately described as "not-yet-cultured," stems from the observation that when traditional laboratory plating techniques are used, only a tiny fraction (0.001% to 2%) of the microbial cells observed under a microscope form colonies [26] [42]. This is known as the "great plate count anomaly" [21]. The term does not mean the microbes cannot ever be cultured; rather, it indicates that the correct conditions for their growth have not yet been identified. The primary reasons for this include [21] [26] [54]:

• Inadequate simulation of the natural environment: Laboratory media often fail to replicate the complex biotic and abiotic factors of the marine environment, such as specific nutrient fluxes, signaling molecules, and interactions with other microbes.
• Oligotrophic nature: Many marine bacteria are adapted to low-nutrient (oligotrophic) conditions and can be inhibited or killed by the high nutrient concentrations in standard laboratory media [21] [26].
• Dependence on other microbes: Some bacteria rely on metabolites or signaling compounds produced by other organisms in their community, a dependence disrupted during isolation on a Petri dish [21] [26].
• Dormant states: A significant portion of environmental microbes may be in a viable but non-culturable (VBNC) or dormant state and require specific stimuli to "resuscitate" and grow [21] [54].

What are the most effective strategies to initiate growth of a newly isolated marine strain that shows no activity in standard media?

Overcoming initial growth inertia requires mimicking the strain's natural habitat. Key strategies, summarized in the table below, have proven effective [21] [26] [4].

Table: Strategies for Initiating Growth of Challenging Marine Isolates

Strategy	Protocol Summary	Key Application
Nutrient Reduction [26]	Use filtered seawater as a base; employ dilution-to-extinction in low-nutrient media.	Cultivating oligotrophic bacteria (e.g., SAR11 clade) inhibited by rich media.
Co-culture [26]	Cultivate the target strain in the presence of a "helper" strain from the same environment.	Isolating bacteria that require unknown growth factors or need toxic metabolites degraded.
In Situ Cultivation [54]	Use diffusion chambers (e.g., iChip) to incubate cells in their natural environment while being physically separated.	Accessing a wide range of uncultured bacteria by providing natural chemical gradients.
Resuscitation Stimuli [54]	Supplement media with resuscitation-promoting factors (Rpfs), sodium pyruvate, catalase, or quorum-sensing molecules.	Reactivating dormant cells or those in a VBNC state.

How can we rapidly link a new bacterial isolate to a specific bioactivity, such as antibiotic production?

Linking a strain to a bioactivity involves a multi-tiered approach:

• High-Throughput Bioactivity Screening: Initially, crude extracts from the isolate are tested against a panel of target organisms (e.g., clinically relevant pathogens, cancer cell lines) in automated assays [4].
• Genome Mining: Simultaneously, sequence the isolate's genome. Use tools like antiSMASH to scan for Biosynthetic Gene Clusters (BGCs) that encode the machinery for producing known classes of bioactive compounds like non-ribosomal peptides (NRPs) and polyketides (PKs) [63] [4]. This provides a hypothesis for the chemical nature of the bioactivity.
• Metabolomic Correlation: Analyze the extract using LC-MS/MS and employ molecular networking to visualize the chemical profile. Correlate the presence of specific metabolites with the observed bioactivity, and then cross-reference these with the predicted BGCs from the genome in a "metabologenomics" approach [4].

Our metagenomic data suggests high diversity, but our cultivation efforts yield the same common species repeatedly. How can we access the "microbial dark matter"?

To target the uncultured majority, you must move beyond standard plating. A strategic workflow based on microbial ecology is the most effective path forward [21]. The following diagram illustrates a targeted cultivation strategy based on the physiological status and abundance of the target microbe.

Once we have a pure culture, what are the best methods for enhancing the production of a target bioactive compound?

Strain cultivation is just the first step; optimizing production is often necessary.

• OSMAC (One Strain Many Compounds) Approach: Systematically varying cultivation parameters (media composition, salinity, temperature, aeration) can dramatically alter the metabolic output and unlock the production of cryptic compounds [4].
• Co-culture: Cultivating your isolate with other bacteria or fungi can mimic ecological competition or interaction, triggering the activation of silent BGCs and the production of defensive secondary metabolites that are not produced in axenic culture [26] [43].
• Metabolic Engineering: If the BGC is known, modern genetic tools like CRISPR-Cas can be used to knock out regulatory genes or amplify the entire cluster in a heterologous host to overproduce the compound of interest [4].

Troubleshooting Guides

Problem: Contamination in Slow-Growing Cultures

Problem Description: Slow-growing marine isolates are often overgrown by fast-growing contaminants before they can form visible colonies, making purification impossible.

Step-by-Step Solution:

• Confirm the Problem: Use light microscopy to observe the mixed morphology in the colony.
• Employ Physical Separation:
  • Microencapsulation: Disperse the bacterial sample in molten, low-nutrient agarose and emulsify it in oil. This creates gel microdroplets, some containing single cells. The porous agarose allows nutrient exchange while physically separating the target from competitors [26].
  • Flow Cytometric Cell Sorting (FACS): Use FACS to deposit a single cell into each well of a microtiter plate, ensuring the culture originates from one organism [43].
• Use Selective Chemical Agents: Incorporate low-dose antibiotics or antifungal agents specific to the contaminant into the medium. First, test the sensitivity of your target isolate to ensure it is not affected.
• Verify Purity: Once growth occurs, streak the culture onto a fresh plate and verify genetic purity via 16S rRNA gene sequencing.

Problem: Isolate Loses Viability or Bioactivity After Sub-Culturing

Problem Description: An isolate with promising initial bioactivity loses its potency or fails to grow after several transfers in the laboratory.

Step-by-Step Solution:

• Immediate Preservation: Always create a master stock of the original, active isolate. Preserve cells cryogenically at -80°C or in liquid nitrogen using cryoprotectants like glycerol or DMSO [43].
• Replicate Natural Conditions:
  • Mimic the Original Habitat: Review the original isolation conditions. The lab medium may be too rich. Switch to a more oligotrophic medium, such as one prepared with filtered and sterilized seawater [42].
  • Re-introduce Key Factors: The isolate may depend on a signal from another microbe. Attempt to re-grow the isolate in a co-culture with the original, complex environmental sample or with a specific "helper" strain [26].
• Check for Dormancy: The stress of sub-culturing may have induced a VBNC state. Attempt to resuscitate the culture by supplementing the medium with resuscitation-promoting factors (Rpfs) or adding culture supernatant from a growing batch of the same strain [54].

Problem: Silent Biosynthetic Gene Clusters (BGCs)

Problem Description: Genome mining reveals promising BGCs, but the associated compound is not detected in laboratory culture extracts.

Step-by-Step Solution:

• Confirm the Cluster is "Silent": Use advanced LC-HRMS/MS with molecular networking to thoroughly screen extracts under various growth conditions. The compound may be produced at very low levels.
• Apply Heterologous Expression: Clone the entire BGC and express it in a well-characterized, easy-to-manipulate host bacterium (e.g., E. coli or Streptomyces). This can bypass the native regulatory machinery that keeps it silent [4].
• Perturb the System:
  • Genetic Manipulation: Use CRISPR-based tools to knock out a putative repressor gene located within or near the BGC [4].
  • Chemical Epigenetic Modification: Add histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors or DNA methyltransferase inhibitors to the culture. This can alter the epigenetic regulation of the cluster and activate it [4].
  • Co-culture Induction: As a first-line, low-tech approach, use co-culture with other microbes to trigger the BGC's expression ecologically [26].

The Scientist's Toolkit: Research Reagent Solutions

Table: Essential Reagents and Materials for Cultivating Marine Microbes

Item	Function / Application	Technical Notes
Gellan Gum [4]	A gelling agent alternative to agar.	Improves recovery of some marine taxa that are inhibited by agar.
Diffusion Chambers (iChip) [54]	Device for in situ cultivation, allowing environmental nutrients and signals to diffuse to trapped cells.	Critical for accessing microbial diversity not growable in the lab.
Resuscitation-Promoting Factor (Rpf) [54]	A bacterial cytokine that promotes growth and resuscitation from dormancy.	Used as a media supplement to wake up VBNC cells.
Catalase / Sodium Pyruvate [4]	Scavenges hydrogen peroxide and other reactive oxygen species in media.	Reduces oxidative stress, a common barrier to cultivability.
Autoclaved & Separately Sterilized Phosphates [4]	Prevents the formation of hydrogen peroxide during the autoclaving of phosphate and agar together.	A simple media preparation tweak that can significantly improve colony counts.
Siderophores [54]	Iron-chelating compounds.	Can be added to media to facilitate iron acquisition for fastidious isolates.
Quorum Sensing Molecules (AHLs) [43]	Signaling molecules used for bacterial cell-to-cell communication.	Adding these to media can induce cooperative behaviors and growth in some strains.

Overcoming the limitation of low cultivability is a central challenge in marine microbiology. It blocks access to the vast majority of microbial diversity and the novel bioactive compounds they produce. This case study and the accompanying technical support content are framed within a broader thesis on advancing methods to bypass these bottlenecks, highlighting successful strategies for isolating novel taxa and discovering new bioactive compounds from marine environments.

FAQs & Troubleshooting Guides

FAQ 1: What are the most effective strategies to increase the cultivability of marine microorganisms from environmental samples?

Answer: Traditional cultivation methods recover less than 1% of marine microbial diversity [42]. Effective strategies focus on better mimicking the natural environment:

• Modify Media Composition: Use low-nutrient media (like R2A), substitute gellan gum for agar, and add scavengers like pyruvate or catalase to reduce oxidative stress [24] [64].
• Use Innovative Cultivation Devices: Diffusion chambers and the iChip allow microbes to grow in situ by permitting the exchange of chemical signals and nutrients while protected from direct competition [24].
• Apply Extended and Dilution-to-Extinction Cultivation: Many marine bacteria are oligotrophic (adapted to low nutrients). Dilution-to-extinction in low-nutrient media can help isolate these slow-growing species [24] [42].

FAQ 2: How can I isolate rare or novel bacterial taxa that are missed by standard techniques?

Answer: Isolating novel taxa requires breaking from standard protocols. Key approaches include:

• Employ Multiple Media Types: Using a suite of different media is one of the most effective ways to capture a wider diversity. A study in the Western Pacific using five different media recovered 1293 strains belonging to 52 genera, with different media selecting for different taxa [64]. For example, R2A agar yielded the highest number of unique genera [64].
• Extend Incubation Times: Incubate plates for several weeks, as many novel microbes grow very slowly [42].
• Process Media Ingredients Separately: Autoclaving phosphate and agar separately (PS media) before combining can improve cultivability by reducing the formation of growth-inhibiting compounds [24] [42].

FAQ 3: My isolated marine strains do not produce any bioactive compounds in the lab. How can I activate their biosynthetic potential?

Answer: Many biosynthetic gene clusters (BGCs) for compound production are silent under standard lab conditions. The OSMAC (One Strain Many Compounds) approach is key:

• Co-cultivation: Culturing your strain with other microorganisms can mimic natural competition and trigger the production of antimicrobial or other defensive compounds [24].
• Vary Culture Conditions: Alter media composition, temperature, aeration, or salt concentration to activate different BGCs [24].
• Add Specific Elicitors: Introduce small molecules or signaling compounds that may act as triggers for secondary metabolism.

FAQ 4: I am dealing with very slow-growing cultures. How should I handle and preserve these strains?

Answer: Patience and careful handling are required for slow-growing organisms.

• Long-Term Storage: Once a pure culture is obtained, prepare cryostocks with an appropriate cryoprotectant (e.g., glycerol or DMSO) and store at -80°C. For some fragile strains, preservation in liquid nitrogen is preferable.
• Regular Sub-culturing: If necessary, sub-culture on fresh media of the same composition used for initial isolation. However, be aware that repeated sub-culturing can lead to genetic changes and loss of compound production.
• Optimal Short-Term Storage: Some studies show that for certain marine probiotics like L. sakei and P. acidilactici, storage at 4°C can maintain higher viability compared to other temperatures [65].

---

Troubleshooting Guide: Common Isolation and Cultivation Issues

Problem	Possible Causes	Recommended Solutions
No growth on plates	• Media too rich/nutrient-rich• Oxidative stress from media preparation• Incubation time too short	• Use low-nutrient media (e.g., R2A, 10% Marine Agar)• Autoclave phosphate and agar separately; add pyruvate/catalase [24]• Extend incubation time to 4-8 weeks [42]
Only common taxa (e.g., Vibrio, Pseudomonas) grow	• Standard media select for fast-growing generalists	• Use a variety of selective media (e.g., TCBS for Vibrio, MBM for others) [64]• Apply dilution-to-extinction cultivation in low-nutrient liquid media [24]• Use diffusion chambers/iChip for in situ cultivation [24]
Growth is too slow for practical work	• Isolation of oligotrophic or fastidious organisms	• Accept slower growth as a feature of novel isolates [42]• Ensure incubation conditions (temp, pH, salinity) match source environment• Check for required growth factors via co-culture
Cannot induce bioactivity in lab cultures	• Silent biosynthetic gene clusters	• Implement OSMAC: vary media, salinity, temperature, aeration [24]• Utilize co-cultivation with other microbes [24]• Supplement with potential signaling molecules
Contamination in cultures	• Non-axenic original sample or poor sterile technique	• Re-streak on selective media• Use antibiotics in media (if target is not bacteria)• For microalgae, use streak plate/centrifugation or flow cytometry for purification [24]

---

Key Reagent Solutions for Marine Microorganism Cultivation

Table: Essential materials and reagents for isolating and culturing marine microorganisms.

Item	Function & Application
Gellan Gum	A gelling agent that serves as an effective alternative to agar, shown to increase the viable count and recovery of bacteria that do not grow on agar-based media [24].
R2A Agar	A low-nutrient medium designed for the isolation of heterotrophic bacteria from water, proven to yield high bacterial diversity and novel taxa from marine samples [64].
Pyruvate / Catalase	Scavenging agents added to culture media to reduce hydrogen peroxide and other reactive oxygen species, thereby reducing oxidative stress and improving microbial cultivability [24].
iChip (Isolation Chip)	A miniature diffusion chamber device that allows for high-throughput in situ cultivation, dramatically increasing cultivation efficiency and access to novel microbes [24].
Soybean Meal & Molasses	Low-cost, effective nutrient sources that can be used to optimize and replace components in standard media like MRS and NB for cost-effective, large-scale cultivation of probiotics [65].
Dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP)	A specific substrate added to MBM base medium to selectively enrich and isolate bacteria involved in the sulfur cycle and DMSP synthesis from complex environments [64].

---

Case Study: Isolation of a Novel Bioactive Compound Producer Using the iChip

Background The "great plate count anomaly" means most environmental bacteria are considered "unculturable," blocking access to their bioactive compounds. This case details the use of innovative cultivation to overcome this.

Experimental Protocol & Workflow

• Sample Collection: Marine sediment was collected from a rock pond shoreline [42].
• Sample Processing: The sample was serially diluted in sterile seawater.
• Inoculation & Incubation: Dilutions were loaded into an iChip device, which was then incubated in the natural marine environment for several weeks [24].
• Recovery and Pure Culture: The iChip was retrieved, and individual colonies from the chambers were transferred to traditional marine agar plates to establish pure cultures [24].
• Screening for Bioactivity: Pure cultures were screened for antibiotic activity against Staphylococcus aureus.
• Identification & Characterization: The promising isolate was identified via 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The bioactive compound was extracted, purified, and structurally elucidated using NMR and MS [24].

Results & Findings This approach led to the isolation of Alteromonas sp. RKMC-009, a strain that would not grow on standard media [24]. Bioassay-guided fractionation identified a novel N-acyltyrosine compound with a unique α-methyl substituent, demonstrating potent growth inhibition against S. aureus [24]. This case validates that overcoming cultivation barriers directly enables the discovery of new chemical scaffolds with therapeutic potential.

The following workflow diagram illustrates the integrated 'omics and cultivation pipeline for discovering novel bioactive compounds from marine environments.

Conclusion

Overcoming the historical limitations in culturing marine microorganisms requires a paradigm shift from traditional, single-method approaches to integrated, multi-faceted strategies. The synthesis of foundational understanding, innovative cultivation devices, strategic optimization, and rigorous validation demonstrates that accessing the 'uncultured majority' is an achievable goal. The future of marine microbial exploration lies in the continued development of sophisticated cultivation tools, deeper integration with omics technologies, and the application of these isolated novel microbes and their bioactive compounds. For biomedical research, this progress directly translates to an expanded pipeline for drug discovery, offering new avenues for antibiotics, anticancer agents, and other therapeutic molecules derived from previously inaccessible marine microbial sources. The successful cultivation of these elusive organisms will be fundamental to unlocking the next generation of marine natural products and advancing the Blue Economy.

References

• 1. High-Throughput Methods for Culturing Microorganisms in ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC124033/]
• 2. Culturing marine bacteria – an essential prerequisite for ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3815769/]
• 3. Darkness to Discovery: A Comprehensive Mini-Review on ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12274225/]
• 4. Last Decade Insights in Exploiting Marine Microorganisms ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1660-3397/23/3/116]
• 5. Strategies for culturing active/dormant marine microbes [http://mlst.ouc.edu.cn/article/doi/10.1007/s42995-020-00053-z?utm_source=TrendMD&utm_medium=cpc&utm_campaign=Marine_Life_Science_%2526_Technology_TrendMD_0]
• 6. A comprehensive review of development and utilization ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772566925003349]
• 7. Microbial Growth under Limiting Conditions-Future Perspectives - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10383181/]
• 8. Tiny Giants: Marine Microbes' Pivotal Role in the Ocean's Future [https://news.climate.columbia.edu/2025/07/30/tiny-giants-marine-microbes-pivotal-role-in-the-oceans-future/]
• 9. New Study Finds Co-occurring Marine Bacteria May Help Fuel ... [https://coastalscience.noaa.gov/news/new-study-finds-co-occurring-marine-bacteria-may-help-fuel-or-end-red-tide-blooms/]
• 10. Microorganisms from deep-sea hydrothermal vents - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10077256/]
• 11. Deep-sea microbes open new doors to solving ... [https://www.global.hokudai.ac.jp/climate-change/article/1402]
• 12. Global marine microbial diversity and its potential in ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-024-07891-2]
• 13. Troubleshooting Guide: Ensuring Optimal Performance [https://www.tmmedia.in/troubleshooting-guide-ensuring-optimal-performance/]
• 14. Strategies to enhance production of metabolites in ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0960852424007533]
• 15. Impact of Co-Culture on the Metabolism of Marine ... [https://www.mdpi.com/1660-3397/20/2/153]
• 16. Utilizing the co-culture method to improve the investigation ... [https://japsonline.com/abstract.php?article_id=4135&sts=2]
• 17. on the microbiome life-cycle and biogeochemical processes [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12361257/]
• 18. Effects of Gelling Agent and Extracellular Signaling Molecules ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5394321/]
• 19. Engineering an incubation environment that mimics in situ ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9623733/]
• 20. Scientists' warning to humanity: microorganisms and ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41579-019-0222-5]
• 21. Strategies for culturing active/dormant marine microbes [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10077298/]
• 22. Progress in the development of gelling agents for improved ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4511835/]
• 23. Gelling Agents - What To Look For? [https://plantcelltechnology.com/blogs/blog/bloggelling-agents-what-to-look-for?srsltid=AfmBOoo1HckMeJpbE8AwmftXYSjwgb5V73kxiEifIkWLLEoQLR4oqXqr]
• 24. Last Decade Insights in Exploiting Marine Microorganisms as ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11943599/]
• 25. Troubleshooting Culture Media Clumping and Vitrification [https://www.goldbio.com/blogs/articles/troubleshooting-culture-media-clumping-vitrification?srsltid=AfmBOopsM-AXuDdqf8x2Wf8Z7bbjTxzPbAb6mryOIxFFz8sCHd9IyUvs]
• 26. Isolation of Marine : Techniques and Challenges Microorganisms [https://www.azolifesciences.com/article/Isolation-of-Marine-Microorganisms-Techniques-and-Challenges.aspx]
• 27. Culturomics from field-grown crop plants using dilution to ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12174589/]
• 28. Evaluating agar-plating and dilution - to - extinction methods... isolation [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11878766/]
• 29. Microfluidics to Meet Antibiotic Resistance: A Growing ... [https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202511.0470]
• 30. Recent Advances in Microfluidics-Based Monitoring of ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12029729/]
• 31. Opportunities and challenges of using metagenomic to bring... data [https://microbiomejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s40168-022-01272-5]
• 32. Unlocking marine treasures: isolation and mining strategies of natural... [https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2025/np/d5np00013k]
• 33. AI-powered CRISPR could lead to faster gene therapies ... [https://med.stanford.edu/news/all-news/2025/09/ai-crispr-gene-therapy.html]
• 34. as a tool to tap into Targeted natural product... metagenomics marine [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26379658/]
• 35. Frontiers | Targeted as a tool to tap into metagenomics ... marine [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2015.00890/full]
• 36. Cultivation of uncultured marine microorganisms - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10077157/]
• 37. Overcoming the Challenges of Growing Anaerobic Bacteria [https://www.atcc.org/blogs/2024/overcoming-the-challenges-of-growing-anaerobic-bacteria]
• 38. Anaerobic Culture Tips - NDSU VDL [https://www.vdl.ndsu.edu/anaerobic-culture-tips/]
• 39. Anaerobes: General Characteristics - Medical Microbiology [https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK7638/]
• 40. Anoxic Media Design, Preparation, and Considerations [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0076687905970018]
• 41. Troubleshooting Your Anaerobic Digester [https://www.digesterdoc.com/troubleshooting-anaerobic-digesters/]
• 42. Cultivating marine bacteria under laboratory conditions [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/bioengineering-and-biotechnology/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2022.964589/full]
• 43. Marine Microorganisms: Cultivation Methods for Improving ... [https://cordis.europa.eu/project/id/311975/reporting]
• 44. [Response Surface Methodology to Optimize Marine ... [https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24063245/]
• 45. Culturing the uncultured anaerobes from the perspective of ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0966842X25001829]
• 46. Generating a Growth Curve - 2025 UBC iGEM Wiki [https://2025.igem.wiki/ubc-vancouver/protocols/generating-a-growth-curve]
• 47. Fragmented micro-growth habitats present opportunities for ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-024-51944-z]
• 48. Impact of Co-Culture on the Metabolism of Marine ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8879974/]
• 49. Enhancing chemical and biological diversity by co-cultivation [https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/microbiology/articles/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1117559/full]
• 50. and their mechanisms for survival.pdf Marine Extremophiles [https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/marine-extremophiles-and-their-mechanisms-for-survival-pdf/274030729]
• 51. Microbial Diversity in Extreme Marine Habitats and Their... [https://www.bohrium.com/paper-details/microbial-diversity-in-extreme-marine-habitats-and-their-biomolecules/813134098401853442-7956]
• 52. Exploring the secrets of marine microorganisms: Unveiling ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11286668/]
• 53. Understanding Marine Microbes, the Driving Engines of ... [https://kids.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/frym.2016.00001]
• 54. Cultivation of uncultured marine microorganisms [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s42995-021-00093-z]
• 55. Challenges and Approaches of Culturing the Unculturable ... [https://www.mdpi.com/2079-7737/12/12/1499]
• 56. Editorial: Methods in aquatic microbiology - PMC [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10726113/]
• 57. Quantifying the biases in metagenome mining for realistic ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5037447/]
• 58. Benchmarking DNA isolation methods for marine ... [https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-023-48804-z]
• 59. Metagenomics and its impact on environmental ... [https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00203-025-04588-6]
• 60. Exploring omics strategies for drug discovery from ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12394500/]
• 61. Comparative Metagenomics Reveals Microbial Diversity and ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12300337/]
• 62. Marine Metagenomics Community [https://elixir-europe.org/communities/marine-metagenomics]
• 63. Exploring the taxonomical and functional profiles of marine ... [https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11868764/]
• 64. 利用改良培养基探究西太平洋海水可培养细菌多样性 [https://actamicro.ijournals.cn/html/actamicrocn/2021/4/20210408.htm]
• 65. Medium optimization of three marine probiotics and their ... [https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0882401025003249]