Unraveling the Mysteries of Southeastern Australia's Diadromous Fishes
Beneath the surface of southeastern Australia's rivers and coastal waters unfolds one of nature's most extraordinary migratory journeys—a world where fish defy boundaries between fresh and saltwater in a relentless pursuit of survival. These are diadromous fishes, remarkable species whose lives are divided between oceanic and freshwater environments in a delicate dance that has evolved over millennia.
Many diadromous species that were once plentiful are now generally rare or appear to be extinct in some catchments, their decline going largely unnoticed amid Australia's broader biodiversity challenges 2 .
Diadromy represents a specialized form of migration where fish move between marine and freshwater environments during predictable phases of their life cycle. Scientists recognize three distinct types of diadromy:
Anadromous species are born in freshwater, migrate to the ocean to feed and grow, and return to freshwater to reproduce.
Example: Short-finned eel (Anguilla australis)
Catadromous species are born in marine environments and migrate to freshwater, where they spend most of their lives before returning to the ocean to reproduce.
Example: Congolli (Pseudaphritis urvillii) 2
| Species | Type of Diadromy | Conservation Status | Key Habitats |
|---|---|---|---|
| Common galaxias (Galaxias maculatus) | Amphidromous | Secure | Coastal rivers, estuaries |
| Short-finned eel (Anguilla australis) | Catadromous | Declining | Rivers, lakes, wetlands |
| Australian bass (Percalates novemaculeata) | Catadromous | Vulnerable | Coastal rivers, estuaries |
| Cox's gudgeon (Gobiomorphus coxii) | Amphidromous | Secure | Coastal streams |
| Freshwater herring (Potamalosa richmondia) | Amphidromous | Declining | Rivers, estuaries |
| Freshwater mullet (Trachystoma petardi) | Amphidromous | Vulnerable | Coastal rivers |
The evolution of diadromy represents a fascinating adaptation that has puzzled scientists for decades. Why would species develop such complex life cycles requiring physiological adaptations to survive in both freshwater and marine environments?
This theory, proposed by Gross et al., suggests that differences in ecological productivity between marine and freshwater biomes drive the evolution of diadromy 6 . According to this theory:
This would predict that anadromous species should evolve in temperate areas, while catadromous species should evolve in tropical areas.
A phylogenetic study of Clupeiformes challenged this hypothesis, finding that different modes of diadromy did not have predictable ancestry based on latitude 6 . Instead, the research suggested that:
In southeastern Australia, the pattern of diadromy shows interesting latitudinal variations 2 :
This distribution suggests that multiple factors—including historical biogeography, competition, and habitat availability—have shaped the evolution of diadromy in the region.
One of the most powerful tools for understanding diadromous fish migrations has been the study of otoliths—small calcium carbonate structures found in the inner ear of fish.
Micrograph showing growth rings in a fish otolith
A groundbreaking study by Miles (2007) demonstrated the power of otolith microchemistry for understanding the migratory histories of diadromous fishes in southeastern Australia 2 .
| Species | Otolith Sr:Ca Patterns | Interpreted Migration Pattern | Longevity |
|---|---|---|---|
| Freshwater mullet (Myxus petardi) | Distinct variations | Amphidromous | ~5 years |
| Striped gudgeon (Gobiomorphus australis) | Distinct variations | Diadromous | Not specified |
| Freshwater herring (Potamalosa richmondia) | Less obvious patterns | Complex movements | ~10 years |
| Cox's gudgeon (Gobiomorphus coxii) | Less obvious patterns | Complex movements | Not specified |
| Bullrout (Notesthes robusta) | Less obvious patterns | Complex movements | >5 years |
Diadromous fishes face numerous threats in southeastern Australia, many stemming from human modification of river systems and coastal environments.
The construction of dams, weirs, and other river structures has created significant barriers to fish migration throughout southeastern Australia. As of 2023, the Nepean River alone had at least 278 structures affecting fish passage 7 .
| Species | Passage Efficiency | Factors Affecting Passage |
|---|---|---|
| Cox's gudgeon | Variable | Water velocity at entrance and exit |
| Freshwater mullet | Lower in entry than exit traps | Entrance trap design, water velocity |
| Sea mullet | Lower in entry than exit traps | Entrance trap design, water velocity |
Australian seafood production, including diadromous fisheries, is increasingly exposed to environmental extremes driven by a changing climate 1 .
Agricultural and urban runoff
Loss of riparian vegetation
Reducing flow volumes
Competition and predation
Understanding the hidden lives of diadromous fishes requires specialized tools and methods. Here are some of the key approaches used by researchers:
Analyzing the chemical composition of fish ear stones to reconstruct migratory histories and environmental experiences.
Collecting water samples and analyzing them for trace DNA left behind by fish species 5 .
Specialized traps and monitoring systems installed at fishways to assess species passage efficiency 7 .
Advanced genetic techniques to identify distinct populations and understand gene flow between regions 9 .
Tracking movements in water bodies to map migratory routes and identify barriers.
Determining trophic relationships and habitat use by identifying energy sources and migratory connectivity.
The diadromous fishes of southeastern Australia represent a remarkable evolutionary adaptation to the region's variable environments, but they face an uncertain future. While challenges are significant, growing scientific understanding and conservation efforts offer hope for these extraordinary migrants.